Phoenix Academy
110
·
250
·
over 14 years
dhall2511 wrote:
….The All Whites could of play on the following dates during the Herbert era:


17/08/2005
03/09/2005
07/09/2005
08/10/2005
12/10/2005
12/11/2005
16/11/2005
01/03/2006
16/08/2006
02/09/2006
06/09/2006
07/10/2006
11/10/2006
15/11/2006
02/06/2007
06/06/2007 vs Ukraine (cancelled)
08/09/2007
12/09/2007
13/10/2007 vs Fiji (cancelled)
06/02/2008
26/03/2008
31/05/2008
04/06/2008
20/08/2008
11/10/2008
15/10/2008
11/02/2009
01/04/2009 vs Indonesia (cancelled)
12/08/2009
05/09/2009 vs Iraq (cancelled)
14/10/2009
18/11/2009
11/08/2010
03/09/2010
07/09/2010
17/11/2010
09/02/2011
29/03/2011 vs Japan (cancelled)
10/08/2011
02/09/2011
06/09/2011
07/10/2011
11/10/2011
11/11/2011
15/11/2011
15/08/2012
06/02/2013
04/06/2013
14/08/2013
11/10/2013

That is all I have to say about Ricki.

I think this has more to do with NZF, which is why I agree that van Hattum should bugger off.

First Team Squad
200
·
1.9K
·
over 16 years
rjmiller wrote:

We do need to change. I think Ricki has given a lot and been very unfairly criticised at times. But at the same time he is limited. I think he has given all he can and there is a need for fresh ideas, especially to try and instill more confidence in the players when they are on the ball and have others give them better options. I also think NZ would generally be better off with a more pressing defence, that is something we should have the players to do but has never really been implemented under Ricki at all. 

Not completely convinced by Emblem. I would sound out Graham Arnold and see if he was interested, I think he would be a good fit. Otherwise advertise it and see who is interested.

 

was going to suggest this myself...but feared an anti-aussie squad paying me a dawn visit. i f we could afford Arnold why not at least sound him out, after all he has done some good stuff wth the mariners and also has international management experience

Appiah without the pace
6.6K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Spend money on a big coach and play no games. Or play some games with a local coach.

Still Believin'
750
·
5.7K
·
about 17 years
Jeff Vader wrote:

Having read that article, I have to say I lost a little bit of respect for Ricki.

A good leader knows when its time to get out. He might have stayed 6 months longer at the Phoenix than necessary but he got out when it became apparent it was time to. I think if he cannot see that its time to get out, he is delusional.

 

I have not been one to kick Ricki but he needs a brick bat for that. Granted its media and they can slant it how they like but its not a good look. It just wreaks of absolute god/messiah complex and arrogance.


Or he was simply feeling very emotional JV.

Still should not have said it though

And it is time to move on.


Marquee
300
·
5K
·
about 17 years
paullt wrote:
rjmiller wrote:

We do need to change. I think Ricki has given a lot and been very unfairly criticised at times. But at the same time he is limited. I think he has given all he can and there is a need for fresh ideas, especially to try and instill more confidence in the players when they are on the ball and have others give them better options. I also think NZ would generally be better off with a more pressing defence, that is something we should have the players to do but has never really been implemented under Ricki at all. 

Not completely convinced by Emblem. I would sound out Graham Arnold and see if he was interested, I think he would be a good fit. Otherwise advertise it and see who is interested.

 

was going to suggest this myself...but feared an anti-aussie squad paying me a dawn visit. i f we could afford Arnold why not at least sound him out, after all he has done some good stuff wth the mariners and also has international management experience


As others have mentioned Arnold just signed a two year deal in Japan, so can't see him coaching the AW's anytime soon.
Phoenix Academy
110
·
250
·
over 14 years
Buffon II wrote:

What millions?

NZF is broke as it is. Any money made from the Mexico tie will certainly not go towards a "quality overseas coach".

Not gonna happen.

Broke? What are you on about? Have a look at the NZF 2012 Annual Report. NZF are doing a good job of managing the financial injection that came courtesy of NZ's WC appearance in 2010. This is probably one thing NZF can actually take credit for.
Still Believin'
750
·
5.7K
·
about 17 years
U037 wrote:
Buffon II wrote:

What millions?

NZF is broke as it is. Any money made from the Mexico tie will certainly not go towards a "quality overseas coach".

Not gonna happen.

Broke? What are you on about? Have a look at the NZF 2012 Annual Report. NZF are doing a good job of managing the financial injection that came courtesy of NZ's WC appearance in 2010. This is probably one thing NZF can actually take credit for.


Hmm, yeah, nah.

The injection of $5m (allegedly) from TV rights for next week's game certainly helps. We would be facing a much more frugal future without it.

But setting aside $1m of that over 4 years ($250k per year) to pay the All Whites coach would at least be a start. You could maybe then afford to get someone with A-League assistant-coaching experience.

Seriously people, that's the standard of candidate we will be looking at. Most A-League head coaches would expect to be on $300k+

I posted once before that I think probably the most value for money investment that Sport NZ could make into NZF is topping up the All Whites coach salary by $100-200k a year. That would push the job up into another league of candidate (although still not great). They won't do it though because the All Whites are not ranked high enough to be perceived as worth investing in (unlike the Football Ferns).


Phoenix Academy
110
·
250
·
over 14 years
terminator_x wrote:
U037 wrote:
Buffon II wrote:

What millions?

NZF is broke as it is. Any money made from the Mexico tie will certainly not go towards a "quality overseas coach".

Not gonna happen.

Broke? What are you on about? Have a look at the NZF 2012 Annual Report. NZF are doing a good job of managing the financial injection that came courtesy of NZ's WC appearance in 2010. This is probably one thing NZF can actually take credit for.

Hmm, yeah, nah.

The injection of $5m (allegedly) from TV rights for next week's game certainly helps. We would be facing a much more frugal future without it.

But setting aside $1m of that over 4 years ($250k per year) to pay the All Whites coach would at least be a start. You could maybe then afford to get someone with A-League assistant-coaching experience.

Seriously people, that's the standard of candidate we will be looking at. Most A-League head coaches would expect to be on $300k+

I posted once before that I think probably the most value for money investment that Sport NZ could make into NZF is topping up the All Whites coach salary by $100-200k a year. That would push the job up into another league of candidate (although still not great). They won't do it though because the All Whites are not ranked high enough to be perceived as worth investing in (unlike the Football Ferns).

It's hard to have a discussion with someone who has already made up their mind, but lets look at the numbers...
For the year ending 31 December 2012, NZF were approx $8million in the black. This included an increase in revenue (i.e. income) of approx $300K (there's your future coach's salary). Sure, total equity will be less now, but they can shortly expect another injection of $5million.
At what point do you think it's safe to start spending money on a quality coach for the premier team?
WeeNix
57
·
830
·
about 13 years

Jeff Vader for coach? He knows a lot about football.

Marquee
380
·
9.6K
·
about 17 years

How much is Ricki pulling in from the AW's gig?

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
almost 15 years
dhall2511 wrote:

Keep Herbert until Russia 2018. Think about this, who thought that Mexico was going to finish 4th in the hex? If Panama defended better against the USA it might be another story, also the OFC SHOULD HAVE AT LEAST ONE SPOT FOR THE WORLD CUP, also we have to remember he has saved the All Whites after the Vanuatu disaster of 2004, and also these are following pros and cons during his time as manager:

Pros
1st ever win over a European side, Georgia in '06 and also Serbia in '10.
1st ever point in the FIFA Confederations Cup, Iraq '09 and 1st ever point in the FIFA World Cup.
1st time the All Whites to qualify for the FIFA World Cup in 28 years.
Most matches managed by an All Whites manager 59-22-14-23, 9 more than John Adshead.

Cons
5-1 Mexico loss and 5-0 losses to Spain and Venezuela.
2-0 loss to New Caledonia which meant no 2013 FIFA Confederations Cup.
Cancelled matches vs. Ukraine '07, Fiji '07, Indonesia '09 and Iraq '09. (Japan '11 don't count)
Key injuries to key players.
The All Whites could of play on the following dates during the Herbert era:

17/08/2005
03/09/2005
07/09/2005
08/10/2005
12/10/2005
12/11/2005
16/11/2005
01/03/2006
16/08/2006
02/09/2006
06/09/2006
07/10/2006
11/10/2006
15/11/2006
02/06/2007
06/06/2007 vs Ukraine (cancelled)
08/09/2007
12/09/2007
13/10/2007 vs Fiji (cancelled)
06/02/2008
26/03/2008
31/05/2008
04/06/2008
20/08/2008
11/10/2008
15/10/2008
11/02/2009
01/04/2009 vs Indonesia (cancelled)
12/08/2009
05/09/2009 vs Iraq (cancelled)
14/10/2009
18/11/2009
11/08/2010
03/09/2010
07/09/2010
17/11/2010
09/02/2011
29/03/2011 vs Japan (cancelled)
10/08/2011
02/09/2011
06/09/2011
07/10/2011
11/10/2011
11/11/2011
15/11/2011
15/08/2012
06/02/2013
04/06/2013
14/08/2013
11/10/2013

That is all I have to say about Ricki.

Another quality post aye Dhal. Just for once, ONCE, explain how this is paid for and by whom. Just once rather than this continuous crap about internationals we could have played or should play against which are far fetched and belong in Alice in Wonderland.
Tegal Fan Club Member #1.5
200
·
2.2K
·
over 16 years

Is an overseas coach an option... i.e. funds to get a reasonable one... 

Still Believin'
750
·
5.7K
·
about 17 years
U037 wrote:
terminator_x wrote:
U037 wrote:
Buffon II wrote:

What millions?

NZF is broke as it is. Any money made from the Mexico tie will certainly not go towards a "quality overseas coach".

Not gonna happen.

Broke? What are you on about? Have a look at the NZF 2012 Annual Report. NZF are doing a good job of managing the financial injection that came courtesy of NZ's WC appearance in 2010. This is probably one thing NZF can actually take credit for.

Hmm, yeah, nah.

The injection of $5m (allegedly) from TV rights for next week's game certainly helps. We would be facing a much more frugal future without it.

But setting aside $1m of that over 4 years ($250k per year) to pay the All Whites coach would at least be a start. You could maybe then afford to get someone with A-League assistant-coaching experience.

Seriously people, that's the standard of candidate we will be looking at. Most A-League head coaches would expect to be on $300k+

I posted once before that I think probably the most value for money investment that Sport NZ could make into NZF is topping up the All Whites coach salary by $100-200k a year. That would push the job up into another league of candidate (although still not great). They won't do it though because the All Whites are not ranked high enough to be perceived as worth investing in (unlike the Football Ferns).

It's hard to have a discussion with someone who has already made up their mind, but lets look at the numbers...

For the year ending 31 December 2012, NZF were approx $8million in the black. This included an increase in revenue (i.e. income) of approx $300K (there's your future coach's salary). Sure, total equity will be less now, but they can shortly expect another injection of $5million.

At what point do you think it's safe to start spending money on a quality coach for the premier team?


It is likewise hard to have a discussion with someone who can't read a set of accounts.

You are quoting figures from the consolidated accounts, which include the New Zealand Football Foundation - a charitable trust which is untouchable from an operating point of view.

NZF's own equity at the end of 2012 was $2.5m. Down from $4.4m at the start of 2011.

NZF also made operating losses of $316k in 2011 and $964k in 2012 and was only able to report surpluses by making transfers from the international teams reserve, which is now gone.

Without the $5m we were looking pretty fucked but NZF have done well to secure that money and right the ship somewhat.

I would say that a modest investment in the All Whites coach is justified, but if you are thinking it should be much more than $1m over 4 years then I think that is putting us back into fairly risky territory. Of course, neither of us has the full financial picture (including the upcoming 2013 result) so this is largely speculation.


Legend
2.4K
·
17K
·
about 17 years
dhall2511 wrote:
 also the OFC SHOULD HAVE AT LEAST ONE SPOT FOR THE WORLD CUP

No.

Just no.
WeeNix
170
·
550
·
about 11 years

and the reason that the americas cup gets millions in cash for a minority rich mans sport as opposed to the all whites representing new zealand across the world in the true global sport would be.........

Still Believin'
750
·
5.7K
·
about 17 years
Arsenal wrote:

How much is Ricki pulling in from the AW's gig?


When he was also employed by the Phoenix his salary was being topped up by NZF by $50k pa.

Since then he has probably been getting no more than $100k pa from NZF. It's been a WC qualification year, but there's also been very little actual activity.

This is the problem for NZF. Despite all the criticism thrown at him Ricki has been damn good value for money. The new coach is likely to cost NZF at least 2 or 3 times more than what they've been paying up until now - a decent hit on the budget.


Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years
robmm1976 wrote:

and the reason that the americas cup gets millions in cash for a minority rich mans sport as opposed to the all whites representing new zealand across the world in the true global sport would be.........

............. because we're all but the world's best at it. Go figure.

First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years
robmm1976 wrote:

and the reason that the americas cup gets millions in cash for a minority rich mans sport as opposed to the all whites representing new zealand across the world in the true global sport would be.........



Because the cup led to positive cash injections into the New Zealand economy. If we make the World Cup that will not happen.
Phoenix Academy
20
·
300
·
almost 12 years
robmm1976 wrote:

and the reason that the americas cup gets millions in cash for a minority rich mans sport as opposed to the all whites representing new zealand across the world in the true global sport would be.........

 

Its in the nzrfu's best interest to keep actual global sports in New Zealand down, ( Football/Basketball/Trackandfield) but sports such as the americans cup/lawn bowls/ netball and bmx downhill mountain bike riding arent a threat, so they get the money.  But the nzrfu doesnt want  the government to give money  to big global sports, because that would be a threat, so they just have a word or two to the government and the media to make sure this doesnt happen. If soccer and basketball started to get funds to get big into the schools, rugby union would be screwed.

First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years
brettdale55 wrote:
robmm1976 wrote:

and the reason that the americas cup gets millions in cash for a minority rich mans sport as opposed to the all whites representing new zealand across the world in the true global sport would be.........

 

Its in the nzrfu's best interest to keep actual global sports in New Zealand down, ( Football/Basketball/Trackandfield) but sports such as the americans cup/lawn bowls/ netball and bmx downhill mountain bike riding arent a threat. But the nzrfu doesnt want government going to big global sports, because that would be a threat, so they just have a word or two to the government and the media to make sure this doesnt happen.


So the NZRU are the illuminati?
Marquee
300
·
5K
·
about 17 years
brettdale55 wrote:
robmm1976 wrote:

and the reason that the americas cup gets millions in cash for a minority rich mans sport as opposed to the all whites representing new zealand across the world in the true global sport would be.........

 

Its in the nzrfu's best interest to keep actual global sports in New Zealand down, ( Football/Basketball/Trackandfield) but sports such as the americans cup/lawn bowls/ netball and bmx downhill mountain bike riding arent a threat. But the nzrfu doesnt want government going to big global sports, because that would be a threat, so they just have a word or two to the government and the media to make sure this doesnt happen.


For fucks sake.
Phoenix Academy
20
·
300
·
almost 12 years
robmm1976 wrote:

and the reason that the americas cup gets millions in cash for a minority rich mans sport as opposed to the all whites representing new zealand across the world in the true global sport would be.........

 

The newzealand senior blind bowls team got 17K from HPSNZ to prepare for their world champs the Tall Blacks and Tall Ferns got $0. Any sport that is deemed to be a threat to rugby union will not get funding. small sports globally will though, because its not a threat.

First Team Squad
59
·
1.5K
·
over 13 years
terminator_x wrote:
Arsenal wrote:

How much is Ricki pulling in from the AW's gig?


When he was also employed by the Phoenix his salary was being topped up by NZF by $50k pa.

Since then he has probably been getting no more than $100k pa from NZF. It's been a WC qualification year, but there's also been very little actual activity.

This is the problem for NZF. Despite all the criticism thrown at him Ricki has been damn good value for money. The new coach is likely to cost NZF at least 2 or 3 times more than what they've been paying up until now - a decent hit on the budget.

At the time of the last world cup, NZF claimed they were giving the Phoenix more than this largely for the use of Ricki. His salary was higher than is being claimed but was simply accounted for in a strange way. I imagine that stopped when he was no longer employed.
First Team Squad
59
·
1.5K
·
over 13 years

brettdale55 wrote:

Its in the nzrfu's best interest to keep actual global sports in New Zealand down, ( Football/Basketball/Trackandfield) but sports such as the americans cup/lawn bowls/ netball and bmx downhill mountain bike riding arent a threat, so they get the money.  But the nzrfu doesnt want  the government to give money  to big global sports, because that would be a threat, so they just have a word or two to the government and the media to make sure this doesnt happen. If soccer and basketball started to get funds to get big into the schools, rugby union would be screwed.


Paranoid much?

Marquee
380
·
9.6K
·
about 17 years
brettdale55 wrote:
robmm1976 wrote:

and the reason that the americas cup gets millions in cash for a minority rich mans sport as opposed to the all whites representing new zealand across the world in the true global sport would be.........

 

The newzealand senior blind bowls team got 17K from HPSNZ to prepare for their world champs the Tall Blacks and Tall Ferns got $0. Any sport that is deemed to be a threat to rugby union will not get funding. small sports globally will though, because its not a threat.



Phoenix Academy
20
·
300
·
almost 12 years

Arsenal: I have no idea who those two people are in your last post.

Phoenix Academy
110
·
250
·
over 14 years
terminator_x wrote:
U037 wrote:
terminator_x wrote:
U037 wrote:
Buffon II wrote:

What millions?

NZF is broke as it is. Any money made from the Mexico tie will certainly not go towards a "quality overseas coach".

Not gonna happen.

Broke? What are you on about? Have a look at the NZF 2012 Annual Report. NZF are doing a good job of managing the financial injection that came courtesy of NZ's WC appearance in 2010. This is probably one thing NZF can actually take credit for.

Hmm, yeah, nah.

The injection of $5m (allegedly) from TV rights for next week's game certainly helps. We would be facing a much more frugal future without it.

But setting aside $1m of that over 4 years ($250k per year) to pay the All Whites coach would at least be a start. You could maybe then afford to get someone with A-League assistant-coaching experience.

Seriously people, that's the standard of candidate we will be looking at. Most A-League head coaches would expect to be on $300k+

I posted once before that I think probably the most value for money investment that Sport NZ could make into NZF is topping up the All Whites coach salary by $100-200k a year. That would push the job up into another league of candidate (although still not great). They won't do it though because the All Whites are not ranked high enough to be perceived as worth investing in (unlike the Football Ferns).

It's hard to have a discussion with someone who has already made up their mind, but lets look at the numbers...

For the year ending 31 December 2012, NZF were approx $8million in the black. This included an increase in revenue (i.e. income) of approx $300K (there's your future coach's salary). Sure, total equity will be less now, but they can shortly expect another injection of $5million.

At what point do you think it's safe to start spending money on a quality coach for the premier team?

It is likewise hard to have a discussion with someone who can't read a set of accounts.

You are quoting figures from the consolidated accounts, which include the New Zealand Football Foundation - a charitable trust which is untouchable from an operating point of view.

NZF's own equity at the end of 2012 was $2.5m. Down from $4.4m at the start of 2011.

NZF also made operating losses of $316k in 2011 and $964k in 2012 and was only able to report surpluses by making transfers from the international teams reserve, which is now gone.

Without the $5m we were looking pretty fucked but NZF have done well to secure that money and right the ship somewhat.

I would say that a modest investment in the All Whites coach is justified, but if you are thinking it should be much more than $1m over 4 years then I think that is putting us back into fairly risky territory. Of course, neither of us has the full financial picture (including the upcoming 2013 result) so this is largely speculation.


Thanks t_x, that's what I was looking for: some sort of semi-decent analysis rather than vague statements like "we are broke", and we are "fucked".

So, lets just assume we'll have to keep paying peanuts and getting monkeys.

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years
brettdale55 wrote:
robmm1976 wrote:

and the reason that the americas cup gets millions in cash for a minority rich mans sport as opposed to the all whites representing new zealand across the world in the true global sport would be.........

 

Its in the nzrfu's best interest to keep actual global sports in New Zealand down, ( Football/Basketball/Trackandfield) but sports such as the americans cup/lawn bowls/ netball and bmx downhill mountain bike riding arent a threat, so they get the money.  But the nzrfu doesnt want  the government to give money  to big global sports, because that would be a threat, so they just have a word or two to the government and the media to make sure this doesnt happen. If soccer and basketball started to get funds to get big into the schools, rugby union would be screwed.

I disagree. It's in NZF's interests to keep NZ football a financial disaster area because they then don't have to work at putting on major events like regular All Whites internationals, they can just work quietly away divvying up the pot on local and overseas junkets for themselves and their cronies while the media continue focusing on government spending on America's Cup/lawn bowls/netball/rowing etc. (and of course obsessive coverage of egg-ball, horse-racing...) If 'soccer' started to get funds to get big into the schools, NZF would be screwed... and rugby union wouldn't give two shits.

Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
about 17 years

Ricki will get sacked via fax

Marquee
300
·
5K
·
about 17 years
Feverish wrote:

Ricki will get sacked via fax


So he could still be here this time next year?
Blue Cod
93
·
760
·
over 14 years
U037 wrote:
Buffon II wrote:

What millions?

NZF is broke as it is. Any money made from the Mexico tie will certainly not go towards a "quality overseas coach".

Not gonna happen.

Broke? What are you on about? Have a look at the NZF 2012 Annual Report. NZF are doing a good job of managing the financial injection that came courtesy of NZ's WC appearance in 2010. This is probably one thing NZF can actually take credit for.

Also I've read a figure of $5 million from selling the second leg television rights and ticket sales. Reportedly there's still about $4.5 million of the WC 2010 money invested. That's hardly "broke".

The problem with bringing in a good overseas coach, and I'd love a fresh attacking mindset, is a lack of games. NZF hardly likes to dip into it's purse to fund internationals. However a new coach could target the next Confederations Cup in 2016, which should, if we qualify, be self-funding from the $1 million plus prize money for winning Oceania. That should be a decent carrot for any up and coming coach wanting to make a name on the international stage. Outside of Ramon Tribulietx of ACFC, I don't think there's a domestic coach good enough.

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years
Sanday wrote:
Feverish wrote:

Ricki will get sacked via fax


So he could still be here this time next year?

If he doesn't quit and his mates at NZF don't sack him, he could still be here when you're in your grave mate.

Starting XI
430
·
2.6K
·
over 16 years
robmm1976 wrote:

and the reason that the americas cup gets millions in cash for a minority rich mans sport as opposed to the all whites representing new zealand across the world in the true global sport would be.........

Because if we qualify for the world cup, a whole heap of kiwis will go to Brazil and spend our money there. If we had won the AC a whole heap of minority rich men would have come to NZ, spent their money here, and bought luxury yachts. Plus the whole world would have found out that NZ is the land of milk and honey for innovation and design. I think that's the theory anyway (but not one that I actually buy into).
Starting XI
430
·
2.6K
·
over 16 years
terminator_x wrote:

I posted once before that I think probably the most value for money investment that Sport NZ could make into NZF is topping up the All Whites coach salary by $100-200k a year. That would push the job up into another league of candidate (although still not great). They won't do it though because the All Whites are not ranked high enough to be perceived as worth investing in (unlike the Football Ferns).

Just putting this out there because I'm generally interested. Is there any chance of pushing some of these jobs together to make it worthwhile enough to get someone decent? i.e. get a national coach for both mens & women? Or make them coach one of the youth sides as well?
Realising there are problems with both options, but getting a full-time coach for just the AWs seems a bit over the top given how many games we play, and combining with an a-league gig clearly wasn't working for Ricki last season.
Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
almost 15 years
Bluemagic wrote:
U037 wrote:
Buffon II wrote:

What millions?

NZF is broke as it is. Any money made from the Mexico tie will certainly not go towards a "quality overseas coach".

Not gonna happen.

Broke? What are you on about? Have a look at the NZF 2012 Annual Report. NZF are doing a good job of managing the financial injection that came courtesy of NZ's WC appearance in 2010. This is probably one thing NZF can actually take credit for.

Also I've read a figure of $5 million from selling the second leg television rights and ticket sales. Reportedly there's still about $4.5 million of the WC 2010 money invested. That's hardly "broke".

The problem with bringing in a good overseas coach, and I'd love a fresh attacking mindset, is a lack of games. NZF hardly likes to dip into it's purse to fund internationals. However a new coach could target the next Confederations Cup in 2016, which should, if we qualify, be self-funding from the $1 million plus prize money for winning Oceania. That should be a decent carrot for any up and coming coach wanting to make a name on the international stage. Outside of Ramon Tribulietx of ACFC, I don't think there's a domestic coach good enough.

Couple of points.

They don't get $1m for winning Oceania. They get $1m as 1st loser at the Confeds. Its semantics, but your point stands. OFC don't have 2 cents let alone $1m. Much like ACFC don't get 500k for winning O League - they get it for 1st loser at CWC.

The $4-5 m went to the NZ Football Foundation who do grants for football stuff. Its not an investment at all. Essentially we have to make 5m stretch across 4 years because there is no money next year. If we spend it all this year, then we are definitely fucked next year.

Term speaks the truth. NZF hide the numbers so a casual glance makes it look like they are doing well. They are losing money hand over fist and spending beyond their means.

Still Believin'
750
·
5.7K
·
about 17 years
Bluemagic wrote:
U037 wrote:
Buffon II wrote:

What millions?

NZF is broke as it is. Any money made from the Mexico tie will certainly not go towards a "quality overseas coach".

Not gonna happen.

Broke? What are you on about? Have a look at the NZF 2012 Annual Report. NZF are doing a good job of managing the financial injection that came courtesy of NZ's WC appearance in 2010. This is probably one thing NZF can actually take credit for.

Also I've read a figure of $5 million from selling the second leg television rights and ticket sales. Reportedly there's still about $4.5 million of the WC 2010 money invested. That's hardly "broke".

The problem with bringing in a good overseas coach, and I'd love a fresh attacking mindset, is a lack of games. NZF hardly likes to dip into it's purse to fund internationals. However a new coach could target the next Confederations Cup in 2016, which should, if we qualify, be self-funding from the $1 million plus prize money for winning Oceania. That should be a decent carrot for any up and coming coach wanting to make a name on the international stage. Outside of Ramon Tribulietx of ACFC, I don't think there's a domestic coach good enough.


That $4.5m is in a charitable trust for the benefit of grassroots football, which is great. They can't simply raid it to pay the bills.

Without the $5m from TV rights for next week we would be in a pretty bad financial position (see my previous post) and close to going broke within the next couple of years. The $5m needs to be spent very carefully.

However, you are right to point out the dilemma of appointing a good coach on a good wage without also committing to a decent international programme for the AWs. Otherwise, what is that coach actually doing? You could easily spend all of that $5m just on that.

See how fragile our financial position actually is?

EDIT: what Jeff said :)

Tegal
·
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Surely its not a case of whether we can attract Sir Alex Ferguson to come out of retirement, but whether its worth paying him a lot to have a holiday in the islands a couple of times year. 

Still Believin'
750
·
5.7K
·
about 17 years
hlmphil wrote:
terminator_x wrote:


I posted once before that I think probably the most value for money investment that Sport NZ could make into NZF is topping up the All Whites coach salary by $100-200k a year. That would push the job up into another league of candidate (although still not great). They won't do it though because the All Whites are not ranked high enough to be perceived as worth investing in (unlike the Football Ferns).

Just putting this out there because I'm generally interested. Is there any chance of pushing some of these jobs together to make it worthwhile enough to get someone decent? i.e. get a national coach for both mens & women? Or make them coach one of the youth sides as well?

Realising there are problems with both options, but getting a full-time coach for just the AWs seems a bit over the top given how many games we play, and combining with an a-league gig clearly wasn't working for Ricki last season.


We might have to do that. You are putting all your eggs in one basket though and that was one of the big criticisms of Ricki - that he had too much influence over NZ football in general (All Whites, Phoenix, Olympics etc)
Phoenix Academy
110
·
250
·
over 14 years

Jeff Vader wrote:
Term speaks the truth. NZF hide the numbers so a casual glance makes it look like they are doing well. They are losing money hand over fist and spending beyond their means.

Sounds horribly like a Ponzi scenario; no one will know the true situation until the money runs out!

Still Believin'
750
·
5.7K
·
about 17 years

For some context here's a list of the last ten All Whites coaches (which conveniently takes us back to Adshead '82) and the other highlights from their coaching CVs. This is the market we're in people...

Mick Waitt 2002-2004 - Napier City Rovers, Capital Football DoF, Wellington Olympic

Ken Dugdale 1998-2002 - Football Kingz, Vollen UL (Norway)

Joe McGrath 1997-1998 - Rep of Ireland U17, Bohemians, Kilkenny City

Keith Pritchett 1996-1997 - Waitakere City, United Soccer 1 DoF

Bobby Clark 1994-1995 - Dartmouth College, Stanford University, Notre Dame

Ian Marshall 1990-1993 - Rangers (Chch), Christchurch United

John Adshead 1989 - Western Australia State Leagues, Manurewa, NZ Knights

Kevin Fallon 1985-1988 - Gisborne City, Waikato Utd, Mt Albert Grammar School

Allan Jones 1983-1984 - Bristol City, Blyth Spartans, Darlington, Bermuda

John Adshead 1979-1982 - see above

So basically, if we get in a coach with experience at a higher level than English League 1, US College Football or the A-League they will be the most qualified coach we have ever had.

Don't hold your breath for Hiddink.


You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up