All Whites v Ireland | Fri 15th November 2019 | 8.40am | SS7

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.6K
·
over 14 years

theprof wrote:

djtim3000 wrote:

theprof wrote:

djtim3000 wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

djtim3000 wrote:

theprof wrote:

djtim3000 wrote:

AlfStamp wrote:

Hahaha he scores. Have to say I disagree with you two. Too early a judgement. 17 months without a game, a debutant and a team trying to play a new type of game for us. Havent thought he was that bad, just inexperienced. His job is to score goals, he just did.

His job is also to be an option for a pass while in transition, and to recieve and make passes, he wasn't doing well enough in that regard. He wasn't bad, just struggling with the step up in pace. Goal was well worked though, so hats off to him.

jeez give the kid a break, its his first international with a new coach and new instructions. Everyone is gonna be finding their stride and place in the team. He did the one thing we really needed him to do - put the ball in the back of the net.

Give the kid a break? It's not like I was beating on him, all I was referring to is the step up required for international football can be difficult, not that he's shark and should be dropped forever. It's also not fudgeing tiddlywinks, we need to expect more of our players regardless of the team, the systems or the situation. Stop being precious.

If you're expecting more than that out of 20 year old debutants then you're always gonna be disappointed. Having unrealistic expectations doesn't help anyone. It ain't precious to be realistic.

I wasn't expecting anything, I know McCowatt is a good player and has a huge future, but it's still a fair and relatively benign (or so I thought) comment to say a player is struggling when stepping up a level. Particularly going from the a-league to international. I'm not sure how this has offended so many people, like half the forum are McCowatt's family or something.

Im not sure that anyone has taken offence - for me its a little unfair to say a player is struggling at international level when he's less than 30 minutes into his first game. I was simply saying you should at least give him two or three games before you start saying he's struggling at this level.

Some dude literally told me to fudge off and that I'm a twit. Saying that a player is struggling after 30 minutes making the step up isn't the same thing as you think he'll never make it. It was just an objective perspective based on what I was seeing, and it showed again before Ireland's second goal.

not sure that shows "Taking offence" but maybe a little aggressive given the perceived jusdgement of a player over a short period of time. Eitherway - I called you out for being a little harsh on the kid, and to be fair that second goal cant be on McCowatt - he was defending deeper than he probably needed to be - where was his defender?

meh, semantics. but seriously if young forward player is on debut and in 30 minutes he's tearing up the opposition and causing all sorts of problems and looking like a young messi, would it be OK to say - "wow, he's really made the step up well". Or would you get chastised and told hey, you can't make that sort of judgement of youngster until he's played 3 games at least.

Marquee
3.7K
·
5.8K
·
about 17 years

Fark would you lot stop bloidy hopeless on mobile with all the needless quoting one another over something so bloody petty

and 1 other
valeo
·
Legend
4.6K
·
18K
·
about 17 years

Bit disappointing after the start; but I can see what we're trying to do. Joe Bell and Ryan Thomas is definitely a midfield which could go well in the future.

valeo
·
Legend
4.6K
·
18K
·
about 17 years

Damn, should've scored there

WeeNix
760
·
750
·
over 9 years

Well done Danny, true to your word. Now we need NZF to give him the games he needs to grow a team.

WeeNix
340
·
770
·
almost 17 years

I don't know what game some of you were watching.

Ireland started a B team, we scored horrendously against the run of play and played nothing like "possession football" - miles behind in every stat. Then when Ireland got up they switched to play more defensively and to minimise exertion because they have a game they need to win mid-week yet they still created chance after chance.

It was only luck and Ireland's other obligations that stopped us getting done by 5 or 6 nil.

WeeNix
390
·
960
·
almost 11 years

not bad result for first hit out in 2 years. Lots to work on but the base seems to be there, happy with that, would've liked to see rockarse.

Starting XI
2.6K
·
2.4K
·
over 8 years

Damn Joe Bell is going to be a player, composed, calm and makes good decisions. What an engine as well, impressive run in the 93rd minute!

Overall about the performance that was expected. Happy to see us playing out from the back but some work to do still. Scoring was a bonus but the scoreline probably flatters us a little.

Happy with that for a first hit-out under Hay, definitely some promise to build on.

WeeNix
340
·
770
·
almost 17 years

Joey Johns wrote:

not bad result for first hit out in 2 years. Lots to work on but the base seems to be there, happy with that, would've liked to see rockarse.

If that was meant to be our strongest side he should have started, probably for Just who proved that playing regularly in Wellington IS a substitute for not playing social football in Europe.

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.6K
·
over 14 years

Baiter wrote:

I don't know what game some of you were watching.

Ireland started a B team, we scored horrendously against the run of play and played nothing like "possession football" - miles behind in every stat. Then when Ireland got up they switched to play more defensively and to minimise exertion because they have a game they need to win mid-week yet they still created chance after chance.

It was only luck and Ireland's other obligations that stopped us getting done by 5 or 6 nil.

I don't think the goal was possession football, but rather not fudgeing panic and hoof the ball long whenever we receive a pass football, which was well evident.

Starting XI
1.8K
·
4.1K
·
about 17 years

Nelfoos wrote:

Damn Joe Bell is going to be a player. What an engine as well, impressive run in the 93rd minute!

i love how he runs the ball out, sort of like frenkie de jog

Marquee
1.7K
·
7.5K
·
almost 17 years

I am super positive after watching this game.  The squad and team selected, the way we tried to play out from the back from the start (even if we got caught occasionally), a midfield that seems to want the ball rather than hiding from it, are all great.  Wasn't sold on Danny Hay being picked, but hopefully if this keeps up we can all get in behind what he looks to be trying to do.

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

djtim3000 wrote:

Baiter wrote:

I don't know what game some of you were watching.

Ireland started a B team, we scored horrendously against the run of play and played nothing like "possession football" - miles behind in every stat. Then when Ireland got up they switched to play more defensively and to minimise exertion because they have a game they need to win mid-week yet they still created chance after chance.

It was only luck and Ireland's other obligations that stopped us getting done by 5 or 6 nil.

I don't think the goal was possession football, but rather not fudgeing panic and hoof the ball long whenever we receive a pass football, which was well evident.

Though to be fair, when Ireland turned things up to change the game and pressed us high at the start of the second half, we had no answer and kept giving the ball away. Once they took the lead they eased off and we had a bit more breathing space. but it's hard to escape the feeling that whenever Ireland felt like they needed to go up a gear or two, they could and we'd have no answer for it. The backline in particular was very shaky when pressed.

Marquee
1.7K
·
7.5K
·
almost 17 years

Baiter wrote:

I don't know what game some of you were watching.

Ireland started a B team, we scored horrendously against the run of play and played nothing like "possession football" - miles behind in every stat. Then when Ireland got up they switched to play more defensively and to minimise exertion because they have a game they need to win mid-week yet they still created chance after chance.

It was only luck and Ireland's other obligations that stopped us getting done by 5 or 6 nil.

Are you surprised that ROI were signaficantly better than us?  We haven't played in two years, they have players playing at a significantly higher level than the majority of ours, and are in the middle of a European Qualifying campaign.  Even as a B team, the players have been in the called up squads, have spent time together, have trained in their structures.

Starting XI
7K
·
4.7K
·
almost 10 years

Can't even be too critical about the result either. You have a National side that hasn't played in over 500 days against a quality side who'll be fighting for European Championship Qualification in a few days. Really is apples and oranges stuff.

Happy enough with our performance as a young and inexperienced squad, and it looks like we've opened the pathway from the U20's to move up the senior side which is pleasing. This is just one of those roadblocks (for lack of a better term) that we had to go through, but the signs are promising.

Based on this performance I'm pretty sure we'll be able to beat Lithuania in a few day's time.

WeeNix
340
·
770
·
almost 17 years

No, but I expected us to be competitive and to try and play possession football - neither occured. Other than some occasional short work out of the back which often then resulted in kicking possession away 2 seconds later I spotted none of the things Hay claimed he was going to change.

That display could easily have been a Hudson or Herbert coached team.

Marquee
1.7K
·
7.5K
·
almost 17 years

el grapadura wrote:

djtim3000 wrote:

Baiter wrote:

I don't know what game some of you were watching.

Ireland started a B team, we scored horrendously against the run of play and played nothing like "possession football" - miles behind in every stat. Then when Ireland got up they switched to play more defensively and to minimise exertion because they have a game they need to win mid-week yet they still created chance after chance.

It was only luck and Ireland's other obligations that stopped us getting done by 5 or 6 nil.

I don't think the goal was possession football, but rather not fudgeing panic and hoof the ball long whenever we receive a pass football, which was well evident.

Though to be fair, when Ireland turned things up to change the game and pressed us high at the start of the second half, we had no answer and kept giving the ball away. Once they took the lead they eased off and we had a bit more breathing space. but it's hard to escape the feeling that whenever Ireland felt like they needed to go up a gear or two, they could and we'd have no answer for it. The backline in particular was very shaky when pressed.

That's true, but the way we played did seem to force a change in how they played.  As you say, at the start of the second half they came out and pressed high, and we wilted a little - but we forced a good Euro side to come out in the second half and changed the way they played off the ball.  I think that in itself is a positive.

Marquee
1.7K
·
7.5K
·
almost 17 years

Baiter wrote:

No, but I expected us to be competitive and to try and play possession football - neither occured. Other than some occasional short work out of the back which often then resulted in kicking possession away 2 seconds later I spotted none of the things Hay claimed he was going to change.

That display could easily have been a Hudson or Herbert coached team.

I really think that is overly harsh.

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.6K
·
over 14 years

el grapadura wrote:

djtim3000 wrote:

Baiter wrote:

I don't know what game some of you were watching.

Ireland started a B team, we scored horrendously against the run of play and played nothing like "possession football" - miles behind in every stat. Then when Ireland got up they switched to play more defensively and to minimise exertion because they have a game they need to win mid-week yet they still created chance after chance.

It was only luck and Ireland's other obligations that stopped us getting done by 5 or 6 nil.

I don't think the goal was possession football, but rather not fudgeing panic and hoof the ball long whenever we receive a pass football, which was well evident.

Though to be fair, when Ireland turned things up to change the game and pressed us high at the start of the second half, we had no answer and kept giving the ball away. Once they took the lead they eased off and we had a bit more breathing space. but it's hard to escape the feeling that whenever Ireland felt like they needed to go up a gear or two, they could and we'd have no answer for it. The backline in particular was very shaky when pressed.

We had two MLS CB's at that point. I'm not sure what the tactical flavour of the day is in the US, but perhaps MLS teams don't tend to press in the opposition half as much as they tend to do in the UK leagues.

Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
about 17 years
Baiter wrote:

No, but I expected us to be competitive and to try and play possession football - neither occured. Other than some occasional short work out of the back which often then resulted in kicking possession away 2 seconds later I spotted none of the things Hay claimed he was going to change.

That display could easily have been a Hudson or Herbert coached team.

what. a. load. of. sharke

and 1 other
WeeNix
760
·
750
·
over 9 years

Baiter wrote:

I don't know what game some of you were watching.

Ireland started a B team, we scored horrendously against the run of play and played nothing like "possession football" - miles behind in every stat. Then when Ireland got up they switched to play more defensively and to minimise exertion because they have a game they need to win mid-week yet they still created chance after chance.

It was only luck and Ireland's other obligations that stopped us getting done by 5 or 6 nil.

We didnt play kick and hope football, we attempted to pass the ball on the deck as often as possible. Nearly 2 years since the last time the AW's played and this was under a new coach with something like only 2 actual training days together. We attempted to play pass and move and whilst we failed at it often enough we didnt go back to just trying to defend.  A huge improvement in terms of intent from where we have been for a long time now. Sure it was irelands second team but they have had a hell of a lot more time together than we have had.

Perspective and context matter, not sure why some of you cant understand that extremely simple concept

WeeNix
340
·
770
·
almost 17 years

Sorry I refuse to drink the Kool-Aid but you lot carry on believing that Hay is the messiah. At any point if Ireland wanted to get out of first gear they could/would have pasted us.

Starting XI
2.6K
·
2.4K
·
over 8 years

Baiter wrote:

Sorry I refuse to drink the Kool-Aid but you lot carry on believing that Hay is the messiah. At any point if Ireland wanted to get out of first gear they could/would have pasted us.

Think you're misunderstanding what people are saying. I'm still anti-Hay as best choice for coach and he is anything but the messiah. However, if you couldn't see the dedicated effort made to implement a different style then you're clueless 
Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
about 17 years

Nelfoos wrote:

Baiter wrote:

Sorry I refuse to drink the Kool-Aid but you lot carry on believing that Hay is the messiah. At any point if Ireland wanted to get out of first gear they could/would have pasted us.

Think you're misunderstanding what people are saying. I'm still anti-Hay as best choice for coach and he is anything but the messiah. However, if you couldn't see the dedicated effort made to implement a different style then you're clueless 

probably first time he watched the AWs

Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years

Seeing alot of playing the man not the ball here. Everyone calm down or you can take 24 hours off.

...and I'll make it the 24 hours of the Lithuania game because I'm like that.

First Team Squad
2K
·
1.9K
·
almost 17 years

I wish friendlies didn't have these unlimited sub rules (or whatever it is, 6?), really makes the second half of games feel so disjointed, and lessons what it means to get a cap. Thought it was pointless/strange Hay made a sub in injury time...

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

aitkenmike wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

djtim3000 wrote:

Baiter wrote:

I don't know what game some of you were watching.

Ireland started a B team, we scored horrendously against the run of play and played nothing like "possession football" - miles behind in every stat. Then when Ireland got up they switched to play more defensively and to minimise exertion because they have a game they need to win mid-week yet they still created chance after chance.

It was only luck and Ireland's other obligations that stopped us getting done by 5 or 6 nil.

I don't think the goal was possession football, but rather not fudgeing panic and hoof the ball long whenever we receive a pass football, which was well evident.

Though to be fair, when Ireland turned things up to change the game and pressed us high at the start of the second half, we had no answer and kept giving the ball away. Once they took the lead they eased off and we had a bit more breathing space. but it's hard to escape the feeling that whenever Ireland felt like they needed to go up a gear or two, they could and we'd have no answer for it. The backline in particular was very shaky when pressed.

That's true, but the way we played did seem to force a change in how they played.  As you say, at the start of the second half they came out and pressed high, and we wilted a little - but we forced a good Euro side to come out in the second half and changed the way they played off the ball.  I think that in itself is a positive.

It's not as if they were struggling in the first half either, the impression I got is that their instructions were to get a goal as early as possible in the second half and then see the game out, which is pretty much what happened. I think they wanted to avoid any negative media coverage if they didn't win, but at the same time not expend too much energy in getting there.

I do think we did some good things, our goal was a very good international quality goal with accurate and decisive touches, and quick ball movement which is what you need at international level. We were able to find some decent possession in the middle of the park but the players we have there now may well be some of the best we've ever produced so that's not exactly surprising or revolutionary. The challenge though is how to transfer that into controlling games and being able to beat sides like Ireland. Because that game wasn't controlled by us, it was bossed by Ireland from the first minute to the last, even when they were down.

And I do think that's disappointing because I thought that this All Whites side would be much more of a match for a second string Irish side, whose first-string side is at best a middling European team who may not even make it to the 24-team EURO next year. Ireland won the game very easily, and too easily in my eyes. Anything but a win against Lithuania on Monday would be a massive disappointment.

Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years

Alf will be back after the Lithuania game.

We don't have many rules but it's not unreasonable to ask people to abide by them. If anyone else wants time off feel free to try me.

Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
over 13 years

It’s been too long between drinks, everyone is a little over excited. 

Great to see them playing again. 

What do we have lined up after Lithuania? 

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Global Game wrote:

It’s been too long between drinks, everyone is a little over excited. 

Great to see them playing again. 

What do we have lined up after Lithuania? 

From memory there were hints that we may have games in March, but nothing confirmed as far as I know.

Starting XI
2.6K
·
2.4K
·
over 8 years

Winston Reid isn't travelling to Lithuania apparently, headed back to London now. Encouraging performance from him after 18 months.

Wood and Thomas also not travellijng.

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

It's just good to see him play football again.

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Time to move on, Lithuania next up. They finished their EURO 2020 qualifying campaign with a 6-0 loss to Portugal this morning.

They finished last in Group B, with 7 losses and 1 draw from 8 games, and 5 goals scored and 25 conceded.

Anything but a win here will be a massive disappointment for me.

Starting XI
1.8K
·
4.1K
·
about 17 years

Hard News wrote:

Alf will be back after the Lithuania game.

We don't have many rules but it's not unreasonable to ask people to abide by them. If anyone else wants time off feel free to try me.

That's Alf effectively banned from international football for what is likely to be another  500+ days

Phoenix Academy
220
·
360
·
over 5 years

The man's name is "Baiter". Don't take it.

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

reg22 wrote:

Hard News wrote:

Alf will be back after the Lithuania game.

We don't have many rules but it's not unreasonable to ask people to abide by them. If anyone else wants time off feel free to try me.

That's Alf effectively banned from international football for what is likely to be another  500+ days

Surely the Oceania WC qualifying campaign would have to kick off in the next 12 months. 

Then again, you may be completely right...

Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years

I suspect if he'd screamed 'f off' in the face of an official after a behavior warning on the pitch he'd have hot the same ban so seems right.

Phoenix Academy
79
·
180
·
almost 5 years

el grapadura wrote:

reg22 wrote:

Hard News wrote:

Alf will be back after the Lithuania game.

We don't have many rules but it's not unreasonable to ask people to abide by them. If anyone else wants time off feel free to try me.

That's Alf effectively banned from international football for what is likely to be another  500+ days

Surely the Oceania WC qualifying campaign would have to kick off in the next 12 months. 

Then again, you may be completely right...

Have OFC Nations Cup in June 2020

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

LSA2SB wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

reg22 wrote:

Hard News wrote:

Alf will be back after the Lithuania game.

We don't have many rules but it's not unreasonable to ask people to abide by them. If anyone else wants time off feel free to try me.

That's Alf effectively banned from international football for what is likely to be another  500+ days

Surely the Oceania WC qualifying campaign would have to kick off in the next 12 months. 

Then again, you may be completely right...

Have OFC Nations Cup in June 2020

Just because FIFA have scheduled it, don't mean OFC gonna play it...

Phoenix Academy
79
·
180
·
almost 5 years

el grapadura wrote:

LSA2SB wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

reg22 wrote:

Hard News wrote:

Alf will be back after the Lithuania game.

We don't have many rules but it's not unreasonable to ask people to abide by them. If anyone else wants time off feel free to try me.

That's Alf effectively banned from international football for what is likely to be another  500+ days

Surely the Oceania WC qualifying campaign would have to kick off in the next 12 months. 

Then again, you may be completely right...

Have OFC Nations Cup in June 2020

Just because FIFA have scheduled it, don't mean OFC gonna play it...

True, but from this link, OFC requested it to be added to the calendar on the 6th November

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up

You need to be logged in to do that!