The Travelling Circus - playing home games around NZ

Starting XI
480
·
2.6K
·
almost 17 years

2ndBest wrote:

Kiwi Hatter wrote:

Snip:

Sky aren't going to pay more for the rights unless more people watch us. For the future of the club, we can't just focus on Wellington. That's a reality. Pure and simple. 

Just about all clubs lose money in the A-league, so clearly it's not the club business model that's the problem. It's the business model of the league. Perhaps this will improve with the new TV deal. 

Fans in Auckland do turn up. More so than ones in Wellington. and yes that is the nature of one off games and having a bigger population.

The club has never said that current wellington fans are the problem. If we were getting 12K every week, this wouldn't be an issue. But for some reason, people who play and watch football, don't comes to games. That's the problem. I'm unconvinced that these people don't know the games are on. They just choose not to go. Maybe its EPL snobbery, maybe it's the stadium, maybe it's the cost, maybe it's the team. But marketing isn't a magic bullet. 

You obviously don't know about (good) marketing then. 

Welnix's business model was to break even, any dumb c**t knows that that isn't going to happen, unless they start winning, (even then they probably won't break even)

I pay thousands of dollars a year going to see the Phoenix, & most of the time it is to watch sub standard players trying to do their best. I'm used to that sort of s**t, I've followed a s**t team most of my life, but the shark team I've followed in NZ seem to be taking this piss a bit too much!

LG
Legend
5.7K
·
23K
·
almost 17 years

2ndBest wrote:

Kiwi Hatter wrote:

Snip:

Sky aren't going to pay more for the rights unless more people watch us. For the future of the club, we can't just focus on Wellington. That's a reality. Pure and simple. 

Just about all clubs lose money in the A-league, so clearly it's not the club business model that's the problem. It's the business model of the league. Perhaps this will improve with the new TV deal. 

Fans in Auckland do turn up. More so than ones in Wellington. and yes that is the nature of one off games and having a bigger population.

The club has never said that current wellington fans are the problem. If we were getting 12K every week, this wouldn't be an issue. But for some reason, people who play and watch football, don't comes to games. That's the problem. I'm unconvinced that these people don't know the games are on. They just choose not to go. Maybe its EPL snobbery, maybe it's the stadium, maybe it's the cost, maybe it's the team. But marketing isn't a magic bullet. 

Dale if the fans down here don't pull their fingers out their kids won't have a team to want to play for. So yes it is partially  our own  fault but these are the very people  the club should be  targeting . 

Surge
·
Can I have some lungs please miss
1.1K
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years

The focus needs to shift from why we/they won't to how we/they can. Sure criticise, ut be constructive and offer a (realistic) solution (that hasn't been tried/failed previously).

This continual oft-repeated spiral of woe and negativity is pointless. For mine, until the on-field performance improves, consistently (not a good game here and there), we can play wherever we like for whomever we must please (FFA, sponsors, Fever, etc) but the simple fact is mediocre performances will attract mediocre crowds.

If Welnix are unable (or unwilling) to invest in, and/or attract, talent both on and off the pitch that can provide this - WE'RE DOOMED!!!

immhoo (and on goes the spiral lol).

Appiah without the pace
6.5K
·
19K
·
over 16 years

If people want to be willfully ignorant about the context we are in, then that's their prerogative. Personally, I'd rather have all games in Wellington, but that's just not feasible in the current environment so I've accepted the circumstances. Unfortunately we support a minor code, in a small city, with the club's fate in the hands of those fudgewits at the FFA. If this is what keeps us afloat, then who am I to complain. 

The Special One
560
·
2.4K
·
about 17 years

"Good" marketing campaigns cost. Lots. Especially if you want any cut-through in the events market, cos there is a fudge-ton of things on and the Nix aren't just competing against other sports, but other events around town for your spending money. 

I'd have to assume that the advertising/marketing there is probably isn't targeted towards avid football fans either.

I feel it's probably the avenues that the Phoenix don't have control over that will build hype, get people through the gate. Word of mouth, fluff pieces and positive articles in the local papers every week etc. Possibly should try social media influencers also (if there are any in Wellington!)

Listen here Fudgeface
3.7K
·
15K
·
about 14 years

I quite like the faux-away trips we get to do for these games. Granted, I can't make them all this year, but they are a nice substitute for jumping on a 2 hour train to go to an away game, for example.

Surge
·
Can I have some lungs please miss
1.1K
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years

The other factor to consider is whilst other clubs marketing budget is spent (predominantly) locally, ours is not - so we may well be spending comparable $$$$ overall but that budget is layered more thinly due to the breadth of our "home" games.

What Welnix must do (as well as the onfield stuff) is be smart with their promos, and probably a little leftfield (pun intended). The bus/shelter thing has become a little anonymous now and whilst I'm sure it's great "value", I would be surprised if their weren't other avenues that would provide a better ROI - in particular consideration of the niches in which we can, and should be, targeting.

We have a stable base (us, and the others who make up the 5k or so people that turn up rain/hail/shine/fri/sat/sun/5pn/7pm/3pm/whatever) but the club NEEDS to directly engage the other 5k who would probably come come if we were winning, and the additional 5k that will come when the Nix are the "hot" thing in town... all of this becomes a lot easier; and cheaper - when the team is winning regularly (regardless of the style of football).

Marquee
7.1K
·
9.3K
·
over 13 years

I don't think the crowds are bad at all, they are definitely favourable compared to the Lions and not far off the Hurricanes (who play in the top competition in the world, in the national sport and play less than half the games that the Phoenix play at home) and also compared to other leagues like the SPL and Serie A.

The business plan has to work at just under 10k in bad seasons and over 10k in good seasons, with a period of bad - neutral seasons in rebuilding phases between title tilts. But the TV audience and membership numbers definitely have to go up, which is where the traveling circus comes in.

Marquee
7.1K
·
9.3K
·
over 13 years

Surge wrote:

The other factor to consider is whilst other clubs marketing budget is spent (predominantly) locally, ours is not - so we may well be spending comparable $$$$ overall but that budget is layered more thinly due to the breadth of our "home" games.

What Welnix must do (as well as the onfield stuff) is be smart with their promos, and probably a little leftfield (pun intended). The bus/shelter thing has become a little anonymous now and whilst I'm sure it's great "value", I would be surprised if their weren't other avenues that would provide a better ROI - in particular consideration of the niches in which we can, and should be, targeting.

We have a stable base (us, and the others who make up the 5k or so people that turn up rain/hail/shine/fri/sat/sun/5pn/7pm/3pm/whatever) but the club NEEDS to directly engage the other 5k who would probably come come if we were winning, and the additional 5k that will come when the Nix are the "hot" thing in town... all of this becomes a lot easier; and cheaper - when the team is winning regularly (regardless of the style of football).

As part of the new license the FFA has agreed to increase the advertising for the A-League as a whole in NZ, one of the problems is that people watch the Phoenix but they don't have second teams in Australia to support and watch. Sky is only going to up what they pay if ratings for the A-League as a whole improve, not just the Phoenix.

Starting XI
4K
·
3.6K
·
about 10 years

Ryan wrote:

I don't think the crowds are bad at all, they are definitely favourable compared to the Lions and not far off the Hurricanes (who play in the top competition in the world, in the national sport and play less than half the games that the Phoenix play at home) and also compared to other leagues like the SPL and Serie A.

That's the problem though isnt it?

To any reasonable person we have a great dedicated fan base, that other teams in other sports in the same situation would beg for with reasonable numbers turning up consistently.

The problem is trying to marry the word reasonable and the FFA together.

and 1 other
The better Barnes
210
·
360
·
over 12 years

Ryan wrote:

I don't think the crowds are bad at all, they are definitely favourable compared to the Lions and not far off the Hurricanes (who play in the top competition in the world, in the national sport and play less than half the games that the Phoenix play at home) and also compared to other leagues like the SPL and Serie A.

The business plan has to work at just under 10k in bad seasons and over 10k in good seasons, with a period of bad - neutral seasons in rebuilding phases between title tilts. But the TV audience and membership numbers definitely have to go up, which is where the traveling circus comes in.

This year in their 6 home games, the Canes had 22k, 20k, 16k, 14k, 14k and 10k crowds. Not sure you can say Nix crowds are not far off that
First Team Squad
280
·
1.6K
·
almost 12 years

The Phoenix talk about fan responsibility (turn up, bring a friend). What about organisational responibility, Dome has been in the job 5 + years? with the club failing on so many fronts.

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

Kyle1502 wrote:

Ryan wrote:

I don't think the crowds are bad at all, they are definitely favourable compared to the Lions and not far off the Hurricanes (who play in the top competition in the world, in the national sport and play less than half the games that the Phoenix play at home) and also compared to other leagues like the SPL and Serie A.

The business plan has to work at just under 10k in bad seasons and over 10k in good seasons, with a period of bad - neutral seasons in rebuilding phases between title tilts. But the TV audience and membership numbers definitely have to go up, which is where the traveling circus comes in.

This year in their 6 home games, the Canes had 22k, 20k, 16k, 14k, 14k and 10k crowds. Not sure you can say Nix crowds are not far off that

Bearing in mind they were Runners up at the beginning of the season and Champions by the end of it. You would need to compare crowds to years when they were shark
The better Barnes
210
·
360
·
over 12 years

sthn.jeff wrote:

Kyle1502 wrote:

Ryan wrote:

I don't think the crowds are bad at all, they are definitely favourable compared to the Lions and not far off the Hurricanes (who play in the top competition in the world, in the national sport and play less than half the games that the Phoenix play at home) and also compared to other leagues like the SPL and Serie A.

The business plan has to work at just under 10k in bad seasons and over 10k in good seasons, with a period of bad - neutral seasons in rebuilding phases between title tilts. But the TV audience and membership numbers definitely have to go up, which is where the traveling circus comes in.

This year in their 6 home games, the Canes had 22k, 20k, 16k, 14k, 14k and 10k crowds. Not sure you can say Nix crowds are not far off that

Bearing in mind they were Runners up at the beginning of the season and Champions by the end of it. You would need to compare crowds to years when they were shark

Yes you could compare 2012 Canes crowds to 2016 Nix crowds, but then that still wouldn't be a fair comparison 
Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
over 12 years

Bananas wrote:

Ryan wrote:

I don't think the crowds are bad at all, they are definitely favourable compared to the Lions and not far off the Hurricanes (who play in the top competition in the world, in the national sport and play less than half the games that the Phoenix play at home) and also compared to other leagues like the SPL and Serie A.

That's the problem though isnt it?

To any reasonable person we have a great dedicated fan base, that other teams in other sports in the same situation would beg for with reasonable numbers turning up consistently.

The problem is trying to marry the word reasonable and the FFA together.

We get better crowds than CCM and they've got 3 other clubs in close proximity whose travelling fans can boost their attendance too
Marquee
7.1K
·
9.3K
·
over 13 years

Kyle1502 wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Kyle1502 wrote:

Ryan wrote:

I don't think the crowds are bad at all, they are definitely favourable compared to the Lions and not far off the Hurricanes (who play in the top competition in the world, in the national sport and play less than half the games that the Phoenix play at home) and also compared to other leagues like the SPL and Serie A.

The business plan has to work at just under 10k in bad seasons and over 10k in good seasons, with a period of bad - neutral seasons in rebuilding phases between title tilts. But the TV audience and membership numbers definitely have to go up, which is where the traveling circus comes in.

This year in their 6 home games, the Canes had 22k, 20k, 16k, 14k, 14k and 10k crowds. Not sure you can say Nix crowds are not far off that

Bearing in mind they were Runners up at the beginning of the season and Champions by the end of it. You would need to compare crowds to years when they were shark

Yes you could compare 2012 Canes crowds to 2016 Nix crowds, but then that still wouldn't be a fair comparison 

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/super-rugby/101...

in 2012 and 2013 they were averaging around about 10k per game. So that's pretty favorable considering they play fewer games and have a larger fan base.

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

Kyle1502 wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

Kyle1502 wrote:

Ryan wrote:

I don't think the crowds are bad at all, they are definitely favourable compared to the Lions and not far off the Hurricanes (who play in the top competition in the world, in the national sport and play less than half the games that the Phoenix play at home) and also compared to other leagues like the SPL and Serie A.

The business plan has to work at just under 10k in bad seasons and over 10k in good seasons, with a period of bad - neutral seasons in rebuilding phases between title tilts. But the TV audience and membership numbers definitely have to go up, which is where the traveling circus comes in.

This year in their 6 home games, the Canes had 22k, 20k, 16k, 14k, 14k and 10k crowds. Not sure you can say Nix crowds are not far off that

Bearing in mind they were Runners up at the beginning of the season and Champions by the end of it. You would need to compare crowds to years when they were shark

Yes you could compare 2012 Canes crowds to 2016 Nix crowds, but then that still wouldn't be a fair comparison 

The 2013 season would be a better comparison when they finished 11/15 with Crowds of 10.6, 12.8, 15, 9, 7.7, 13, 8 Average of 10.8 
Opinion Privileges revoked
4.6K
·
9.8K
·
over 14 years

Kiwi Hatter wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

[quote=Kiwi Hatter]

But marketing isn't a magic bullet.

You obviously don't know about (good) marketing then.

Listen here Fudgeface
3.7K
·
15K
·
about 14 years

Doloras. Please try to not be deliberately antagonistic. 

Starting XI
480
·
2.6K
·
almost 17 years

Doloras wrote:

Kiwi Hatter wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

[quote=Kiwi Hatter]

But marketing isn't a magic bullet.

You obviously don't know about (good) marketing then.

The opposite to the Phoenix's marketing, which is not working, hence the reason for the traveling circus!

Marquee
7.1K
·
9.3K
·
over 13 years

Bananas wrote:

Ryan wrote:

I don't think the crowds are bad at all, they are definitely favourable compared to the Lions and not far off the Hurricanes (who play in the top competition in the world, in the national sport and play less than half the games that the Phoenix play at home) and also compared to other leagues like the SPL and Serie A.

That's the problem though isnt it?

To any reasonable person we have a great dedicated fan base, that other teams in other sports in the same situation would beg for with reasonable numbers turning up consistently.

The problem is trying to marry the word reasonable and the FFA together.

We get better crowds than CCM and they've got 3 other clubs in close proximity whose travelling fans can boost their attendance too

We get only 1k less than Melbourne City and they have a 9 million dollar squad and the entire marketing push of the A-League behind them, not to mention a population base of millions to draw from.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
over 12 years

Ryan wrote:

Bananas wrote:

Ryan wrote:

I don't think the crowds are bad at all, they are definitely favourable compared to the Lions and not far off the Hurricanes (who play in the top competition in the world, in the national sport and play less than half the games that the Phoenix play at home) and also compared to other leagues like the SPL and Serie A.

That's the problem though isnt it?

To any reasonable person we have a great dedicated fan base, that other teams in other sports in the same situation would beg for with reasonable numbers turning up consistently.

The problem is trying to marry the word reasonable and the FFA together.

We get better crowds than CCM and they've got 3 other clubs in close proximity whose travelling fans can boost their attendance too

We get only 1k less than Melbourne City and they have a 9 million dollar squad and the entire marketing push of the A-League behind them, not to mention a population base of millions to draw from.

And Tim Cahill....
Surge
·
Can I have some lungs please miss
1.1K
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years
Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
over 12 years

#squattingonalicence

Opinion Privileges revoked
4.6K
·
9.8K
·
over 14 years

Kiwi Hatter wrote:

The opposite to the Phoenix's marketing, which is not working, hence the reason for the traveling circus!

See, I honestly don't believe you know what (good) marketing is either. I think you have unrealistic expectations of what marketing can accomplish, which is shown in that you don't actually make any concrete suggestions.

Surge
·
Can I have some lungs please miss
1.1K
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years

The best marketing in the world cannot sell a dud product. 

We(lnix) need to fix the product before any upping of the marketing game can expect to have an impact (and conversely, the marketing will become increasingly irrelevant as the product will sell itself, as we've seen in the past - in a range of contexts, not just this one).

Starting XI
480
·
2.6K
·
almost 17 years

Doloras wrote:

Kiwi Hatter wrote:

The opposite to the Phoenix's marketing, which is not working, hence the reason for the traveling circus!

See, I honestly don't believe you know what (good) marketing is either. I think you have unrealistic expectations of what marketing can accomplish, which is shown in that you don't actually make any concrete suggestions.

I am not in the business of producing marketing campaigns for football clubs, so you are correct in saying I don't know what a good marketing campaign for a football club is. 

There are marketing companies, that  will invoice you varying amounts for their services. If you choose a marketing company that isn't very good at marketing your product or service, you choose another one, & hopefully they will be able to achieve better results.

If, on the other hand, you decide to stick with the original marketing company, the chances are very high that the results of subsequent marketing campaigns will achieve similar poor results. 

Case in point being Hamilton last weekend - very poor marketing=very poor turnout.

I hope this has helped you Doloras. Judging by the tone of your previous comment, you probably already know a significant amount about marketing, so maybe YOU could develop a marketing plan for the WELLINGTON Phoenix? 

(Although in hindsight, your skill at producing highly unimaginative memes indicates a lack of marketing nouse!)

The Special One
560
·
2.4K
·
about 17 years

I think if you stick with one marketing company (a good one), chances are actually better that over time you will get better results. 

As a creative it takes time to develop an understanding of a clients business, you are always learning what it is they do or researching what competitors are doing and building a knowledge base to draw from when coming up with advertising/marketing plans. You only get that with time.

Granted, if the creatives doing work for you aren't doing these things and results are continually poor then do give them the flick.

Marquee
410
·
6.3K
·
almost 17 years

My mum says i'm creative.

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

Better be careful she doesn't give you the flick then.

Marquee
7.1K
·
9.3K
·
over 13 years

They changed marketing companies a couple of years ago IIRC, also wasn't the Hamilton game supposed to be marketed by the Hamilton City Council? 

The best marketing campaign that the Phoenix ever had was the fans and sponsors putting nix scarves everywhere, you want Wellington to be bathed in black and yellow on game day. It seems like Wellington Scaffolding is no longer a partner of the team? That's a shame because they did a lot of free advertising, and there's going to be plenty of scaffolding around Wellington for the foreseable future.

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
over 14 years

Kiwi Hatter wrote:

Doloras wrote:

Kiwi Hatter wrote:

The opposite to the Phoenix's marketing, which is not working, hence the reason for the traveling circus!

See, I honestly don't believe you know what (good) marketing is either. I think you have unrealistic expectations of what marketing can accomplish, which is shown in that you don't actually make any concrete suggestions.

I am not in the business of producing marketing campaigns for football clubs, so you are correct in saying I don't know what a good marketing campaign for a football club is. 

There are marketing companies, that  will invoice you varying amounts for their services. If you choose a marketing company that isn't very good at marketing your product or service, you choose another one, & hopefully they will be able to achieve better results.

If, on the other hand, you decide to stick with the original marketing company, the chances are very high that the results of subsequent marketing campaigns will achieve similar poor results. 

Case in point being Hamilton last weekend - very poor marketing=very poor turnout.

I hope this has helped you Doloras. Judging by the tone of your previous comment, you probably already know a significant amount about marketing, so maybe YOU could develop a marketing plan for the WELLINGTON Phoenix? 

(Although in hindsight, your skill at producing highly unimaginative memes indicates a lack of marketing nouse!)

I have to stand up for Doloras on this

There are marketing companies out there that created all sorts of shark campaigns - the Jerry Seinfeld/Vista adverts come immediately to mind as being horrendous and very expensive. That got past creative and went to market. Walmart had a 'Fat Girl Costumes' thing on their website and again, that got past marketing and out in to the market. #susanalbumparty is another. There are all sorts of failed campaigns out there that have flopped and have cost a crap load. Expensive marketing campaigns do not equal results but at what point do you keep throwing money at something until you realise it wont work?

Marketing costs money and they have tried that and its not worked. They are not bottomless pits of money because previous attempts have given enough of a fair indication that it does not work. 

Your position of you keep going until you get results is fine in theory but its not always practical. You may not have an idea about good marketing and I know I do not either but just because its not to our tastes, does not mean its bad. It just means sometimes you have a product you cannot sell. I give you Vegemites iSnack 2.0 and New Coke as examples.

Opinion Privileges revoked
4.6K
·
9.8K
·
over 14 years

Jeff Vader wrote:
#susanalbumparty is another.

Hey, I think I went to that.

Starting XI
480
·
2.6K
·
almost 17 years

Hopefully the fire north of Auckland is going to have a Phoenix rising from the middle of it!

Brilliant piece of advertising!!! ?

Starting XI
4K
·
3.6K
·
about 10 years

Ryan wrote:

We get only 1k less than Melbourne City and they have a 9 million dollar squad and the entire marketing push of the A-League behind them, not to mention a population base of millions to draw from.

Holy crap is that true? I thought both Melbourne teams got huge crowds.  If we are underperforming then Melbourne must be already out the door with numbers like that.

LG
Legend
5.7K
·
23K
·
almost 17 years

which would get worse if South Melbourne get in. Gonna cost them heaps if they DONT get into the A League.

Starting XI
480
·
2.6K
·
almost 17 years

Jeff Vader wrote:

I have to stand up for Doloras on this 

There are marketing companies out there that created all sorts of shark campaigns - the Jerry Seinfeld/Vista adverts come immediately to mind as being horrendous and very expensive. That got past creative and went to market. Walmart had a 'Fat Girl Costumes' thing on their website and again, that got past marketing and out in to the market. #susanalbumparty is another. There are all sorts of failed campaigns out there that have flopped and have cost a crap load. Expensive marketing campaigns do not equal results but at what point do you keep throwing money at something until you realise it wont work?

There are also plenty of succesful marketing campaigns, i.e. TRUMP, Newcastle Brown Ale Super Bowl, Toyota, most of Coca-Cola's campaigns, Nike,  etc.

Marketing costs money and they have tried that and its not worked. They are not bottomless pits of money because previous attempts have given enough of a fair indication that it does not work.

So the marketing they tried didn't work? Your solution is to stop all marketing because it costs money & what they tried didn't work? 

Your position of you keep going until you get results is fine in theory but its not always practical.

When you hear Rob Morrison telling us that we MUST get 10,000 to home games to break even, We MUST increase our membership, we MUST get a better deal from SKY TV, we MUST appeal to the whole of NZ, you would expect the club (that is backed by a consortium of multi-millionaires) to be doing everything in their power to achieve these 'Metrics', including getting an effective & prolonged marketing campaign. I have not seen a prolonged marketing campaign for the Phoenix!

 You may not have an idea about good marketing and I know I do not either (you could always ask Doloras for her insights into effective marketing?) but just because its not to our tastes, does not mean its bad. ( it's just not effective!) It just means sometimes you have a product you cannot sell. I give you Vegemites iSnack 2.0, New Coke, & Wellington Phoenix ;) , as examples.

There are half a million people within one hours drive of Wellington, my opinion is that the club haven't conducted a sufficiently adequate, prolonged marketing campaign to those people. The club do half arsed promo's which are sometimes quite good, but they don't appear to follow them up, or they play two games out of wellington, or they play absolutely s**t, so any momentum is lost.

We need an additional 2500- 3000 at each game through the turnstiles at Westpac Stadium to get our average up to 10000, we aren't that far off. 

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
over 14 years

Kiwi Hatter wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

I have to stand up for Doloras on this 

There are marketing companies out there that created all sorts of shark campaigns - the Jerry Seinfeld/Vista adverts come immediately to mind as being horrendous and very expensive. That got past creative and went to market. Walmart had a 'Fat Girl Costumes' thing on their website and again, that got past marketing and out in to the market. #susanalbumparty is another. There are all sorts of failed campaigns out there that have flopped and have cost a crap load. Expensive marketing campaigns do not equal results but at what point do you keep throwing money at something until you realise it wont work?

There are also plenty of succesful marketing campaigns, i.e. TRUMP, Newcastle Brown Ale Super Bowl, Toyota, most of Coca-Cola's campaigns, Nike,  etc.

Marketing costs money and they have tried that and its not worked. They are not bottomless pits of money because previous attempts have given enough of a fair indication that it does not work.

So the marketing they tried didn't work? Your solution is to stop all marketing because it costs money & what they tried didn't work? 

Your position of you keep going until you get results is fine in theory but its not always practical.

When you hear Rob Morrison telling us that we MUST get 10,000 to home games to break even, We MUST increase our membership, we MUST get a better deal from SKY TV, we MUST appeal to the whole of NZ, you would expect the club (that is backed by a consortium of multi-millionaires) to be doing everything in their power to achieve these 'Metrics', including getting an effective & prolonged marketing campaign. I have not seen a prolonged marketing campaign for the Phoenix!

 You may not have an idea about good marketing and I know I do not either (you could always ask Doloras for her insights into effective marketing?) but just because its not to our tastes, does not mean its bad. ( it's just not effective!) It just means sometimes you have a product you cannot sell. I give you Vegemites iSnack 2.0, New Coke, & Wellington Phoenix ;) , as examples.

There are half a million people within one hours drive of Wellington, my opinion is that the club haven't conducted a sufficiently adequate, prolonged marketing campaign to those people. The club do half arsed promo's which are sometimes quite good, but they don't appear to follow them up, or they play two games out of wellington, or they play absolutely s**t, so any momentum is lost.

We need an additional 2500- 3000 at each game through the turnstiles at Westpac Stadium to get our average up to 10000, we aren't that far off. 

Well thats it then. You've solved it. Get Dome et al on here to read this cause Kiwi Hatter has figured out.

You have so much confirmation bias on this its not funny

Starting XI
4K
·
3.6K
·
about 10 years

The Trump example is a tough one.  I feel like if we followed the Trump campaign we would tell the rugby fans that football is rugby, we would tell the vegans that all the Nix players are vegans, we would tell anyone not interested in sport its not really sport, take all of that back in an interview and somehow against all logic win the a league.

Life and death
2.4K
·
5.5K
·
about 17 years

It has been touched on several times in this thread and commented on before. Good crowd numbers seem to correspond with a good run of results. It seems to me that Welnix have tried every dam thing to increase crowd numbers EXCEPT doing enough to ensure the team is good enough to perform well, win games and attract people through the turnstiles. If the mystical number is 12,000 through the gate to remain viable, then - for Christ's sake - spend some serious money in getting the right coach and the right players to get us fudgeing winning......

and 1 other

The Travelling Circus - playing home games around NZ

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up