R5 vs Melbourne Victory | Sun 10th Nov | 6:00pm | SS7

Trialist
40
·
29
·
over 5 years

Nice point. Hopefully the lads recharge during the off week and get a win back at Westpac. 

Starting XI
1.8K
·
4.1K
·
about 17 years

james dean wrote:

good point, average performance 

hang on, didn't you say you turned on late?

watch the first bit and you'll be happier

and when the inevitable happened we did what was required

i say good, point good performance

Legend
7.3K
·
15K
·
over 16 years

charliec wrote:

Fark - I thought that was in by Rufer

Hooper woulda got it at the back post. Who was it nearly did?

WeeNix
390
·
960
·
almost 11 years

nice to go one up then play ultra defensive for 80 mins. Pathetic from the uffie to not make the guys go for more goals- play negative football get negative results. 

Opinion Privileges revoked
4.7K
·
9.8K
·
over 14 years

^^^ Ah, finally we've got the SACK TALAY chorus going on - after we don't lose for a change! I suppose that's what you call "heightened expectations".


No, seriously, good grit from the guys; Marinovic is really making the people who thought he was a crap pick-up think twice now, I hope.

U Turning
190
·
740
·
over 14 years

Really good point. They played their guts out. Game plan was sound, and could've poached it.

Phoenix Academy
500
·
280
·
about 15 years

Joey Johns wrote:

nice to go one up then play ultra defensive for 80 mins. Pathetic from the uffie to not make the guys go for more goals- play negative football get negative results. 


forget the endorsement. Always take a point away from home, esp agst Victory.

First Team Squad
1.4K
·
1.2K
·
over 5 years

Therell be some tired legs. Great result. Performance wasnt amazing but 10/10 for effort. What was the deal with the ref blowing up when we were on the attack?!? 

Thought ball looked knackered, and a bit hesitant at times. Could have got his shot away or put some blocks in at times. Still, overall, very happy. 

Starting XI
1.8K
·
4.1K
·
about 17 years

Joey Johns wrote:

nice to go one up then play ultra defensive for 80 mins. Pathetic from the uffie to not make the guys go for more goals- play negative football get negative results. 

we had lost all of our games

we have looked quite bad in doing so

we were away

they have at least 3x our budget

we are a new team made up of rookies and left overs

they are full of first rate imports

etc

etc

etc

tradition and history
1.5K
·
9.9K
·
almost 17 years

Watched the game with a Brisbane supporter and his comments were neither of these teams are good enough to make the top 4

Have to agree.

We were not good enough today.

Starting XI
1.6K
·
2.6K
·
almost 17 years

reg22 wrote:

james dean wrote:

good point, average performance 

hang on, didn't you say you turned on late?

watch the first bit and you'll be happier

and when the inevitable happened we did what was required

i say good, point good performance

Sure worked hard for each other. Some good spirit and better organisation. Something to begin building from. 

Trialist
70
·
120
·
over 6 years

wouldn’t mind seeing TAHW get a start in CB for Devere.

Hooper was certainly missed, could’ve been an interesting result. 

Marquee
2.1K
·
8.2K
·
about 17 years

reg22 wrote:

james dean wrote:

good point, average performance 

hang on, didn't you say you turned on late?

watch the first bit and you'll be happier

and when the inevitable happened we did what was required

i say good, point good performance

Fair, I still haven't seen us play for a sustained period in a way that makes me think we can do something this year. 

WeeNix
390
·
960
·
almost 11 years

Will take the away point but we could have lost that game very easily- we looked good when we marked and pressed early which is why its confusing to just play for a draw when you're 1-0 up. 

LG
Legend
5.7K
·
23K
·
almost 17 years

Last 2 games have seen Marinoic become an early contender  for not just our player of the season but the A League too. Outstanding.  I have let any doubts go Doloras.

Starting XI
1.8K
·
4.1K
·
about 17 years

james dean wrote:

reg22 wrote:

james dean wrote:

good point, average performance 

hang on, didn't you say you turned on late?

watch the first bit and you'll be happier

and when the inevitable happened we did what was required

i say good, point good performance

Fair, I still haven't seen us play for a sustained period in a way that makes me think we can do something this year. 

I absolutely agree with that statement. I've already resigned myself to enjoying watching the team improve to the point where we are functional, full of kiwis and pick up the odd win

tradition and history
1.5K
·
9.9K
·
almost 17 years

reg22 wrote:

Joey Johns wrote:

nice to go one up then play ultra defensive for 80 mins. Pathetic from the uffie to not make the guys go for more goals- play negative football get negative results. 

we had lost all of our games

we have looked quite bad in doing so

we were away

they have at least 3x our budget

we are a new team made up of rookies and left overs

they are full of first rate imports

etc

etc

etc

Reg, they certainly not full of first rate imports.

Starting XI
1.6K
·
2.6K
·
almost 17 years

Leggy wrote:

Watched the game with a Brisbane supporter and his comments were neither of these teams are good enough to make the top 4

Have to agree.

We were not good enough today.

I'd be absolutely rapped (and surprised) to be in top 4 form at ANY stage of this season. And there is no way I'd expect that this early, especially with the difficult run of games we've had, when trying to settle a new team, new coach. 

If we can work our way to around 5 or 6 later in the season, and be improving through the season, I think we'd have reason to be pleased enough. We've had about a half all up from Ball, Davilla has just got himself adjusted to the A League physicality, a bunch of kids learning pro football and D as well as attacking duties. Still a lot of room to improve. But I'm not expecting top 4.

Opinion Privileges revoked
4.7K
·
9.8K
·
over 14 years

Joey Johns wrote:

Will take the away point but we could have lost that game very easily-

And we could have won it. We were desperately unlucky especially with Rufer's shot near the end. I don't say we would have deserved to win it, but we didn't deserve to lose some other games.

Legend
7.3K
·
15K
·
over 16 years

Joey Johns wrote:

nice to go one up then play ultra defensive for 80 mins. Pathetic from the uffie to not make the guys go for more goals- play negative football get negative results. 

It's not sack calls- it's the same we gave to Rufer up to now. 'We know you're better- do better!

When we attacked we threatened. Cacace is almost a star and some of the others have real potential to be so.

Starting XI
1.8K
·
4.1K
·
about 17 years

Leggy wrote:

reg22 wrote:

Joey Johns wrote:

nice to go one up then play ultra defensive for 80 mins. Pathetic from the uffie to not make the guys go for more goals- play negative football get negative results. 

we had lost all of our games

we have looked quite bad in doing so

we were away

they have at least 3x our budget

we are a new team made up of rookies and left overs

they are full of first rate imports

etc

etc

etc

Reg, they certainly not full of first rate imports.

It's all relative ;-)

Opinion Privileges revoked
4.7K
·
9.8K
·
over 14 years

Well, I for one don't see that Talay did much wrong today. I don't get the calls about "negative play" when he gave Waine some decent minutes to show what he could do, and in the last 10 we could have snuck a win.

and 1 other
Starting XI
7K
·
4.7K
·
almost 10 years

At least we didn't lose! Seeing us drop to a 5-4-1 setup for the last 15-20 minutes I did think we were asking for it. In saying that I think we worked extremely hard off the ball and it was good to see a relatively solid performance at the back.

Again impressed with Waine when he came on too, pretty hard for an 18 year old to be left up front by himself, but he looked to take on the Victory players and chased hard when out of possession - thankless task for his cameo, but I was impressed with his hunger and a good technique with close control, without too much help.

Good point and something to build on after our international break.

Legend
7.3K
·
15K
·
over 16 years

Doloras wrote:

Well, I for one don't see that Talay did much wrong today. I don't get the calls about "negative play" when he gave Waine some decent minutes to show what he could do, and in the last 10 we could have snuck a win.

Waine at the edge of the box and ten in the box. 

Gamble almost worked. An earlier change might have turned the momentum our way earlier.

Starting XI
1.8K
·
4.1K
·
about 17 years

Some of the comments make me wonder if people think football is a one team game and that everything that happens in a game depends on how our coach decides to set up and has nothing to do with what the other team is trying to achieve.

There are two teams out there. Today, one was a lot better than the other. 

There are reasons for this, reasons that have nothing to do with Talay or the players. And given everything, Talay did everything he could to get us a result. He started by securing the flanks with a change of personnel and formation and he adjusted later in the game when it was so obvious that we could never compete with Victory for 90 minutes.

Ideally we would be playing like Real Madrid right now, but sorry folks that's not where we are at

and 1 other
Phoenix Academy
500
·
280
·
about 15 years

Therell be some tired legs. Great result. Performance wasnt amazing but 10/10 for effort. What was the deal with the ref blowing up when we were on the attack?!? 

Thought ball looked knackered, and a bit hesitant at times. Could have got his shot away or put some blocks in at times. Still, overall, very happy. 

Ball gave everything. 

Opinion Privileges revoked
4.7K
·
9.8K
·
over 14 years

As I've said before, this is the first season in a long while we can be confident that we'll (probably) not be kicked out of the league if we come last, so I'm trying to enjoy what can be enjoyed right now. Wins would be great, of course, but I'm happy right now to have a team that looks like it's trying and a coach who isn't doing/saying anything obviously stupid.

Starting XI
4.1K
·
3.6K
·
about 10 years

God I'm glad to have Cacace back.  He wasn't his usual awesome self, but he was still bloody good. 

WeeNix
740
·
580
·
over 4 years

Smart move by Talay to switch it to a 5-4-1 formation. Put one pacy striker up front and pushed his other pacy players wide and made defenders go deep, and then urged his players to quickly go up in counter attacks. We had many chances to win the game but got unlucky. I reckon if we still played 4 at the back, Victory could've scored another one or two the way they were pressuring. Good job Mr.Talay 

WeeNix
390
·
960
·
almost 11 years

martinb wrote:

Joey Johns wrote:

nice to go one up then play ultra defensive for 80 mins. Pathetic from the uffie to not make the guys go for more goals- play negative football get negative results. 

It's not sack calls- it's the same we gave to Rufer up to now. 'We know you're better- do better!

When we attacked we threatened. Cacace is almost a star and some of the others have real potential to be so.

the guys can certainly play, and they have shown they can play well under uffie at times but for some bizzare reason we seem to revert to the negative defensive set up. Its like there no self belief in the club, as if we're aiming to not get wooden spoon instead of trying to win the competition.

WeeNix
390
·
960
·
almost 11 years

anyways i hope you're all correct and ill be more than happy to eat my own shark if we start going on a winning streak.

Marquee
4K
·
5.5K
·
almost 12 years

I'm with Joey,

We were time wasting in the 49th minute for crying out loud. Those are not the actions of a team or a coach that has self-belief. It was negative and I believe contributed to us conceding.

Their goal was a little lucky with the rebound, but with nearly 70% possession, it was always going to come.

Our selections IMO show Talay is conservative, otherwise Wihongi should be starting ahead of Devere and Waine for Sotorio etc.

Devere is limited, physically and technically whereas Sotorio has an engine and can run, but not much else. Both do have experience at this level though, and that seems enough, even though there are better options out there.

Starting XI
1.8K
·
4.1K
·
about 17 years

i agree on the time wasting thing. 

i've got no time for it. football needs to be played quickly and with certainty. time wasting creates the opposite mindset and it spreads like wild fire through a team that is so inexperienced

i'll also agree that the negativity is there. but it's there for good reason. if it's still there in a few week's i'll agree that there is a problem

Trialist
99
·
76
·
over 4 years

This was a lucky draw against a very average Victory team... Western United put 3 past them last week. Got to go for the 2nd goal to kill the game off but after taking the lead we stopped playing football, not keeping any meaningful possession. In fact I struggle to see what the strengths of this team are supposed to be? Not pressing particularly well, average on the counter attack, can't keep posession when necessary.

My only guess is Talay doesn't have the players in midfield he needs. I can see what he's trying to do and it comes off at times but not nearly enough to push for top 6 this year. Signing some good midfielders who can hold the ball up and pick good passes will surely help.

WeeNix
530
·
800
·
about 10 years

Hooper is a  worry. It was risky from an injury view point buying a player who had not played for so long. Hopefully he will be right in a fortnight for our next game.

tradition and history
1.5K
·
9.9K
·
almost 17 years

KimT88 wrote:

This was a lucky draw against a very average Victory team... Western United put 3 past them last week. Got to go for the 2nd goal to kill the game off but after taking the lead we stopped playing football, not keeping any meaningful possession. In fact I struggle to see what the strengths of this team are supposed to be? Not pressing particularly well, average on the counter attack, can't keep posession when necessary.

My only guess is Talay doesn't have the players in midfield he needs. I can see what he's trying to do and it comes off at times but not nearly enough to push for top 6 this year. Signing some good midfielders who can hold the ball up and pick good passes will surely help.

Talay is not the problem. Our players are not quite good enough.

Legend
7.3K
·
15K
·
over 16 years

Rufer and Steinman had much improved games. And Cacace is a good player.

Marquee
4K
·
5.5K
·
almost 12 years

How do we know our players are not good enough if we don't give them the opportunity/permission and structure to be?

Perhaps Des has ruined me as a support or NZ teams as I expect better.

WeeNix
740
·
580
·
over 4 years

Really good to see some local players getting into the mix now. Hopefully, Hooper becomes a regular starter after the bye round. We really need to start scoring more goals from open play other than pens. Otherwise, its a wooden spoon for us this season. 

Marquee
4.9K
·
6.8K
·
over 11 years

reg22 wrote:

i agree on the time wasting thing. 

i've got no time for it. football needs to be played quickly and with certainty. time wasting creates the opposite mindset and it spreads like wild fire through a team that is so inexperienced

i'll also agree that the negativity is there. but it's there for good reason. if it's still there in a few week's i'll agree that there is a problem

It's not ideal when a team is happy to settle for a draw in a 27 game league with no relegation but it's understandable in this case. I just hope that the license Talay has been given to rebuild the team over a few seasons doesn't lead to us being satisfied with draws and a 9th place finish this season.

R5 vs Melbourne Victory | Sun 10th Nov | 6:00pm | SS7

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up