R17 v Newcastle Jets | Sat 20th Jan | 7.30pm | SS3
and one over Ernie.
A small town in Europe........looking to bounce straight back up....well that aint going to happen
woot!
pacy
Fantastic work. Now for a great home game next.
Unbeaten in 3.
Should get at least 3500 through the turnstyles
"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009
foal30
foal30
Genuinely depressing reading the lack of understanding of the laws and their application.
Have a read of this and try and understand how refs apply the laws in the context of the game
http://www.swosoa.com/index.php/en/referee-article...
You might want to take your own advice - "Fouls that do not have an impact on the ability of a player to play the ball should not be called".
There is no way Rossi putting his hand on the jets player impacted his ability to run and/or shoot.
Genuinely depressing reading the lack of understanding of the laws and their application.
Have a read of this and try and understand how refs apply the laws in the context of the game
http://www.swosoa.com/index.php/en/referee-article...
You might want to take your own advice - "Fouls that do not have an impact on the ability of a player to play the ball should not be called".
There is no way Rossi putting his hand on the jets player impacted his ability to run and/or shoot.
Plus every single corner in every single game has worse shirt pulling than that.
RichieRich
Bullion
Bullion
For what it's worth the Jets fans don't seem to think it was a penalty.
If it wasn't Rossi, say Fox who gave away the penalty I wonder if people wold jump as much? Rossi has had a lot of stick lately...
A lot of people saying he doesn't care, but you could see that was not the case today IMO. When Italiano made a save near the end, he was right there, talking to him, slowing him down - you don't take those moments when you don't give a toss!
A great result, but we are still bottom of the league. Can't get too excited yet. Have had 10 years of building up my hopes.
If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid
Genuinely depressing reading the lack of understanding of the laws and their application.
Have a read of this and try and understand how refs apply the laws in the context of the game
http://www.swosoa.com/index.php/en/referee-article...
You might want to take your own advice - "Fouls that do not have an impact on the ability of a player to play the ball should not be called".
There is no way Rossi putting his hand on the jets player impacted his ability to run and/or shoot.
Plus every single corner in every single game has worse shirt pulling than that.
Pulling a player back by the shirt who is through on goal impacts their ability to play the ball in a significant moment of opportunity.
You do get why these are called the dark arts by players, right? Doesn't make them legal
If we saw a free kick for every shirt pull - the game would never finish.
Soft penalty
Petratos pulled our guy's shirt right in front of the ref first half, ref just waved it on.
Did you notice our throw that was blown out by the wind and given as a foul throw. Then when the Jets did exactly the same thing it was a retake?
one worry aspect for next game is Dura and Rossi Borg getting yellows. Both must be close if not at suspension plus Fox already out
If we saw a free kick for every shirt pull - the game would never finish.
Soft penalty
Petratos pulled our guy's shirt right in front of the ref first half, ref just waved it on.
Did you notice our throw that was blown out by the wind and given as a foul throw. Then when the Jets did exactly the same thing it was a retake?
No, no I did not.
one worry aspect for next game is Dura and Rossi Borg getting yellows. Both must be close if not at suspension plus Fox already out
Moral boosting win.
Ethics , Standards and Virtues all look better
E's Flat Ah's Flat Too
one worry aspect for next game is Dura and Rossi Borg getting yellows. Both must be close if not at suspension plus Fox already out
All good JB?
E's Flat Ah's Flat Too
Genuinely depressing reading the lack of understanding of the laws and their application.
Have a read of this and try and understand how refs apply the laws in the context of the game
http://www.swosoa.com/index.php/en/referee-article...
You might want to take your own advice - "Fouls that do not have an impact on the ability of a player to play the ball should not be called".
There is no way Rossi putting his hand on the jets player impacted his ability to run and/or shoot.
Plus every single corner in every single game has worse shirt pulling than that.
Pulling a player back by the shirt who is through on goal impacts their ability to play the ball in a significant moment of opportunity.
You do get why these are called the dark arts by players, right? Doesn't make them legal
I'd suggest you rewatch the incident before claiming that it had an impact on the player.
Genuinely depressing reading the lack of understanding of the laws and their application.
Have a read of this and try and understand how refs apply the laws in the context of the game
http://www.swosoa.com/index.php/en/referee-article...
You might want to take your own advice - "Fouls that do not have an impact on the ability of a player to play the ball should not be called".
There is no way Rossi putting his hand on the jets player impacted his ability to run and/or shoot.
Plus every single corner in every single game has worse shirt pulling than that.
Pulling a player back by the shirt who is through on goal impacts their ability to play the ball in a significant moment of opportunity.
You do get why these are called the dark arts by players, right? Doesn't make them legal
I'd suggest you rewatch the incident before claiming that it had an impact on the player.
Why, are you suggestibg that Rossi was trying to help him with his balance?
Genuinely depressing reading the lack of understanding of the laws and their application.
Have a read of this and try and understand how refs apply the laws in the context of the game
http://www.swosoa.com/index.php/en/referee-article...
You might want to take your own advice - "Fouls that do not have an impact on the ability of a player to play the ball should not be called".
There is no way Rossi putting his hand on the jets player impacted his ability to run and/or shoot.
Plus every single corner in every single game has worse shirt pulling than that.
Pulling a player back by the shirt who is through on goal impacts their ability to play the ball in a significant moment of opportunity.
You do get why these are called the dark arts by players, right? Doesn't make them legal
I'd suggest you rewatch the incident before claiming that it had an impact on the player.
Who cares? WE WON!
"Ive just re-visited this and once again realised that C-Diddy is a genius - a drunk, Newcastle bred disgrace - but a genius." - Hard News, 11:39am 4th June 2009
Bananas
Bananas
zonknz
charliec
Mainland FC
zonknz
Bananas
Mainland FC
chemi
If we saw a free kick for every shirt pull - the game would never finish.
Soft penalty
Petratos pulled our guy's shirt right in front of the ref first half, ref just waved it on.
Did you notice our throw that was blown out by the wind and given as a foul throw. Then when the Jets did exactly the same thing it was a retake?
Really confused by this comment. The position of the player, and the way in which they release the ball define a foul throw (if play is restarted). If whole ball crosses the line, play restarts. If it never crosses the line completely, play doesn't restart
The wind can't make it a foul throw
Post New Reply
Please Login or Create an account to post a reply.