Crowds - The thread of Australian whining

Marquee
4.4K
·
6.8K
·
over 13 years

If you are holding a special promotion to attract Mormons, you don't hold that promotion on a Sunday do you? Likewise if you holf a promotion for kids, it needs to be at a time that suits kids [or the parents that would be bringing them]

And there you go again, using common sense to discuss FFA decisions. Will you never learn?
Marquee
7.1K
·
9.4K
·
over 13 years

Didn't all clubs do the kids free thing this weekend? I'm pretty sure Victory did.

If so then its out of the clubs hands and in the realm of the FFA - or actually that man in Canada that Dome said does all the scheduling.

Marquee
3.7K
·
5.8K
·
about 17 years

Ryan54 wrote:

ballane wrote:

As a matter of interest is anyone aware if any of the clubs in Aussie have a 7pm kickoff on a Sunday as a regular time slot. Yes im aware 7 here is mostly 5 or earlier over there.Im aware they use it on a Friday and Saturday but think Perth might be the only ones who have used it on a Sunday.

They generally have Perth play at 5pm on Sunday, which is 7pm eastern. So generally no games at 7 on the east coast.

As i suspected NO teams in Aussie are expected to kick off at 7 on a Sunday on aregualar basis,yet not only are we given that time but we get a number of them. Then again must help the FFA throw at us that we are failing in our metrics.I just dont get how people can think 7pm on a Sunday is a good time schedule a game of football.
Appiah without the pace
6.5K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Ryan wrote:

Didn't all clubs do the kids free thing this weekend? I'm pretty sure Victory did.

If so then its out of the clubs hands and in the realm of the FFA - or actually that man in Canada that Dome said does all the scheduling.

Was a HAL wide promotion. pretty sure it was the first time it's been done

LG
Legend
5.7K
·
23K
·
almost 17 years

Fail on our situation. Everyone knows it is a fail on a Sunday nitht for us and I suspect the FFA know that too going on previous experience. We had one game at an earlier time on a Saturday once and there were kids everywhere so to speak. A really good attendence.

Starting XI
1.3K
·
2.8K
·
almost 9 years

Ryan wrote:

Didn't all clubs do the kids free thing this weekend? I'm pretty sure Victory did.

If so then its out of the clubs hands and in the realm of the FFA - or actually that man in Canada that Dome said does all the scheduling.

It was an FFA promotion - given that the Phoenix charge just $2 for kids, it was hardly the bargain of the century and doubt it did much for getting more families along. 

The higher numbers were more likely due to it being the school holidays. I took my 7 year old nephew (who has yet to see the Phoenix lose, this was his 4th game) but had it being during school time, his parents wouldn't have let him go

Budgie lover
620
·
2.2K
·
almost 17 years

Ryan54 wrote:

ballane wrote:

As a matter of interest is anyone aware if any of the clubs in Aussie have a 7pm kickoff on a Sunday as a regular time slot. Yes im aware 7 here is mostly 5 or earlier over there.Im aware they use it on a Friday and Saturday but think Perth might be the only ones who have used it on a Sunday.

They generally have Perth play at 5pm on Sunday, which is 7pm eastern. So generally no games at 7 on the east coast.

Not necessarily, IIRC Brisbane it would be 7pm but Sydney would be 8pm.

Listen here Fudgeface
3.7K
·
15K
·
about 14 years

liberty_nz wrote:

Ryan54 wrote:

ballane wrote:

As a matter of interest is anyone aware if any of the clubs in Aussie have a 7pm kickoff on a Sunday as a regular time slot. Yes im aware 7 here is mostly 5 or earlier over there.Im aware they use it on a Friday and Saturday but think Perth might be the only ones who have used it on a Sunday.

They generally have Perth play at 5pm on Sunday, which is 7pm eastern. So generally no games at 7 on the east coast.

Not necessarily, IIRC Brisbane it would be 7pm but Sydney would be 8pm.

Never on a Sunday though.
Marquee
3.3K
·
5.1K
·
about 13 years

Got sent here:

So interesting article by Liam here saying that the Nix are counting higher crowds than what Westpac does

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/a-league/882...

"The gap between the home attendances reported by the Wellington Phoenix and Westpac Stadium is widening, although the football club says the explanation is simple.

Across four seasons from 2011 to 2015, the Phoenix's reported average home attendances for each season at the Cake Tin were between 2.2 and 4.5 per cent higher than what the stadium reported.

But last season the gap was 13.8 per cent, with the Phoenix reporting an average Westpac Stadium attendance of 7748 and the stadium saying it was 6807. This season the gap was 7.2 per cent in the first three games, excluding the New Year's Day match against Adelaide United."

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

Best game I saw at Westpac (in 2010) when we won in front of 24,000 was from memory a Sunday 4pm kick-off.

LG
Legend
5.7K
·
23K
·
almost 17 years

Perth? We got a penalty?

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

Lonegunmen wrote:

Perth? We got a penalty?

I was thinking v Newcastle. Game before Perth.

Marquee
7.1K
·
9.4K
·
over 13 years

Yakcall wrote:

Got sent here:

So interesting article by Liam here saying that the Nix are counting higher crowds than what Westpac does

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/a-league/882...

"The gap between the home attendances reported by the Wellington Phoenix and Westpac Stadium is widening, although the football club says the explanation is simple.

Across four seasons from 2011 to 2015, the Phoenix's reported average home attendances for each season at the Cake Tin were between 2.2 and 4.5 per cent higher than what the stadium reported.

But last season the gap was 13.8 per cent, with the Phoenix reporting an average Westpac Stadium attendance of 7748 and the stadium saying it was 6807. This season the gap was 7.2 per cent in the first three games, excluding the New Year's Day match against Adelaide United."

It's a beat up over nothing. Dome explained why it happens, the article also said that the Warriors had a 28% discrepancy and other teams in the A-League also have a bigger discrepancy than the Phoenix. 

Another way of writing the article would be "Phoenix have most accurate crowd reporting statistics"

and 1 other
Listen here Fudgeface
3.7K
·
15K
·
about 14 years

Jerzy Merino wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

Perth? We got a penalty?

I was thinking v Newcastle. Game before Perth.

You've got them the wrong way around.
WeeNix
200
·
950
·
about 14 years

Ryan wrote:

Yakcall wrote:

Got sent here:

So interesting article by Liam here saying that the Nix are counting higher crowds than what Westpac does

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/a-league/882...

"The gap between the home attendances reported by the Wellington Phoenix and Westpac Stadium is widening, although the football club says the explanation is simple.

Across four seasons from 2011 to 2015, the Phoenix's reported average home attendances for each season at the Cake Tin were between 2.2 and 4.5 per cent higher than what the stadium reported.

But last season the gap was 13.8 per cent, with the Phoenix reporting an average Westpac Stadium attendance of 7748 and the stadium saying it was 6807. This season the gap was 7.2 per cent in the first three games, excluding the New Year's Day match against Adelaide United."

It's a beat up over nothing. Dome explained why it happens, the article also said that the Warriors had a 28% discrepancy and other teams in the A-League also have a bigger discrepancy than the Phoenix. 

Another way of writing the article would be "Phoenix have most accurate crowd reporting statistics"

I don't understand how the two groups (in every case) can have different numbers. Surely there's just one number.

Listen here Fudgeface
3.7K
·
15K
·
about 14 years

inafoxhole wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Yakcall wrote:

Got sent here:

So interesting article by Liam here saying that the Nix are counting higher crowds than what Westpac does

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/a-league/882...

"The gap between the home attendances reported by the Wellington Phoenix and Westpac Stadium is widening, although the football club says the explanation is simple.

Across four seasons from 2011 to 2015, the Phoenix's reported average home attendances for each season at the Cake Tin were between 2.2 and 4.5 per cent higher than what the stadium reported.

But last season the gap was 13.8 per cent, with the Phoenix reporting an average Westpac Stadium attendance of 7748 and the stadium saying it was 6807. This season the gap was 7.2 per cent in the first three games, excluding the New Year's Day match against Adelaide United."

It's a beat up over nothing. Dome explained why it happens, the article also said that the Warriors had a 28% discrepancy and other teams in the A-League also have a bigger discrepancy than the Phoenix. 

Another way of writing the article would be "Phoenix have most accurate crowd reporting statistics"

I don't understand how the two groups (in every case) can have different numbers. Surely there's just one number.

Did you even read the article?
Starting XI
4K
·
3.6K
·
about 10 years

inafoxhole wrote:

I don't understand how the two groups (in every case) can have different numbers. Surely there's just one number.

The article states variations, like people let in free/early that dont go through the gates, and he said people who are let in when the barcode scanners don't work.

I just wonder where they get accurate numbers of people not being scanned through.

Marquee
7.1K
·
9.4K
·
over 13 years

Bananas wrote:

inafoxhole wrote:

I don't understand how the two groups (in every case) can have different numbers. Surely there's just one number.

The article states variations, like people let in free/early that dont go through the gates, and he said people who are let in when the barcode scanners don't work.

I just wonder where they get accurate numbers of people not being scanned through.

Dome said in the article that sometimes they have people counting, other times they have clickers, and sometimes they just have to estimate.

Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
about 17 years

that sounded like a load of rubbish from Dome to me

LG
Legend
5.7K
·
23K
·
almost 17 years

So can I assume we are all in agreement on one thing? That the Bar Code readers & or  the Tickets/Season Tickets are crap when it comes to admitting one into a game? And therein lays the problem.

Life and death
2.4K
·
5.5K
·
about 17 years

The discrepancy has been for longer than just this year though. I wasn't totally convinced with Dome's explanation and saw one set of figures where there were a couple of hundred difference and thought - could be, then another of about 1000 difference and thought - no way.

If this is widespread and AFA know about it, then not really a problem, if its not and AFA suspect skulduggery it won't help the Nix case in their fight for survival.

I'd think that everyone does it and wants give the impression to everyone but the tax man that they have more people watching than actually are.

Listen here Fudgeface
3.7K
·
15K
·
about 14 years

The discrepancy has been for longer than just this year though. I wasn't totally convinced with Dome's explanation and saw one set of figures where there were a couple of hundred difference and thought - could be, then another of about 1000 difference and thought - no way.

If this is widespread and AFA know about it, then not really a problem, if its not and AFA suspect skulduggery it won't help the Nix case in their fight for survival.

I'd think that everyone does it and wants give the impression to everyone but the tax man that they have more people watching than actually are.

Every club does it in the A-League. Super Rugby/Breaker/Warriors/ITM Cup all do it too. 

It's a complete non-story.

Starting XI
4K
·
3.6K
·
about 10 years

Ryan wrote:

Another way of writing the article would be "Phoenix have most accurate crowd reporting statistics"

Ryan summed it up best here.

Silly sensationilist headlines.

WeeNix
200
·
950
·
about 14 years

The other clubs A, didn't have a change in the size of discrepancies take place last year at B, a time when their metrics became extra important.

Marquee
4.4K
·
6.8K
·
over 13 years

Bananas wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Another way of writing the article would be "Phoenix have most accurate crowd reporting statistics"

Ryan summed it up best here.

Silly sensationilist headlines.

Slow season

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

patrick478 wrote:

Jerzy Merino wrote:

Lonegunmen wrote:

Perth? We got a penalty?

I was thinking v Newcastle. Game before Perth.

You've got them the wrong way around.

You're right. All these play-off games... 

Life and death
2.4K
·
5.5K
·
about 17 years

patrick478 wrote:

The discrepancy has been for longer than just this year though. I wasn't totally convinced with Dome's explanation and saw one set of figures where there were a couple of hundred difference and thought - could be, then another of about 1000 difference and thought - no way.

If this is widespread and AFA know about it, then not really a problem, if its not and AFA suspect skulduggery it won't help the Nix case in their fight for survival.

I'd think that everyone does it and wants give the impression to everyone but the tax man that they have more people watching than actually are.

Every club does it in the A-League. Super Rugby/Breaker/Warriors/ITM Cup all do it too. 

It's a complete non-story.

No its not, just because all A League clubs 'do it' doesn't mean its a non story. If its done for more than just because a couple of 100 per game get let in the back door to attend functions in the hospitality suite - you're right but we are talking thousands here sometimes. What is the purpose of counting attendance? it must have a reason other wise they wouldn't do it. Of course, because attendence numbers drive sponsorship and media revenue, at a stretch, if its an orchestrated plan, its fraudulent. Also mentioned, attendance is one of our metrics for staying in the A League. Of course its a fudgeing story.
Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
over 12 years

patrick478 wrote:

The discrepancy has been for longer than just this year though. I wasn't totally convinced with Dome's explanation and saw one set of figures where there were a couple of hundred difference and thought - could be, then another of about 1000 difference and thought - no way.

If this is widespread and AFA know about it, then not really a problem, if its not and AFA suspect skulduggery it won't help the Nix case in their fight for survival.

I'd think that everyone does it and wants give the impression to everyone but the tax man that they have more people watching than actually are.

Every club does it in the A-League. Super Rugby/Breaker/Warriors/ITM Cup all do it too. 

It's a complete non-story.

No its not, just because all A League clubs 'do it' doesn't mean its a non story. If its done for more than just because a couple of 100 per game get let in the back door to attend functions in the hospitality suite - you're right but we are talking thousands here sometimes. What is the purpose of counting attendance? it must have a reason other wise they wouldn't do it. Of course, because attendence numbers drive sponsorship and media revenue, at a stretch, if its an orchestrated plan, its fraudulent. Also mentioned, attendance is one of our metrics for staying in the A League. Of course its a fudgeing story.

How could it be fraudulent? Stadium attendance numbers are purely a count from the ticket scanners, if there's 100s of people entering who aren't scanning tickets for whatever reason then even a rough estimate which includes them is bound to be more accurate than the scanned ticket count? Short of facial recognition or RFIDs embedded in every possible attendees skull or something how else can you count attendance?
Marquee
7.1K
·
9.4K
·
over 13 years

It's not beyond the realm of reason that the team, sponsors, local government, etc. would up their support and bring in more people through the non ticketed entry ways during a save the nix campaign.

Listen here Fudgeface
3.7K
·
15K
·
about 14 years

patrick478 wrote:

The discrepancy has been for longer than just this year though. I wasn't totally convinced with Dome's explanation and saw one set of figures where there were a couple of hundred difference and thought - could be, then another of about 1000 difference and thought - no way.

If this is widespread and AFA know about it, then not really a problem, if its not and AFA suspect skulduggery it won't help the Nix case in their fight for survival.

I'd think that everyone does it and wants give the impression to everyone but the tax man that they have more people watching than actually are.

Every club does it in the A-League. Super Rugby/Breaker/Warriors/ITM Cup all do it too. 

It's a complete non-story.

No its not, just because all A League clubs 'do it' doesn't mean its a non story. If its done for more than just because a couple of 100 per game get let in the back door to attend functions in the hospitality suite - you're right but we are talking thousands here sometimes. What is the purpose of counting attendance? it must have a reason other wise they wouldn't do it. Of course, because attendence numbers drive sponsorship and media revenue, at a stretch, if its an orchestrated plan, its fraudulent. Also mentioned, attendance is one of our metrics for staying in the A League. Of course its a fudgeing story.

Show me where there are discrepancies of over 2000 people please (you said thousands)
Listen here Fudgeface
3.7K
·
15K
·
about 14 years

The Phoenix are a private entity that have no obligation to report crowd figures.

They can just stop reporting crowd figures publicly completely and this issue goes away entirely. Is that what you want AP?

Listen here Fudgeface
3.7K
·
15K
·
about 14 years

If you want a story - there's a much bigger and more relevant one than this about the club that one could report on if they did a little digging.

Marquee
300
·
5K
·
about 17 years

patrick478 wrote:

If you want a story - there's a much bigger and more relevant one than this about the club that one could report on if they did a little digging.

This sounds interesting.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
over 12 years

patrick478 wrote:

If you want a story - there's a much bigger and more relevant one than this about the club that one could report on if they did a little digging.

Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
about 17 years

expecting a crowd of 30,000 tonight 

First Team Squad
490
·
1.9K
·
over 16 years

me and a friend coming down so make that 30,002

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

patrick478 wrote:

If you want a story - there's a much bigger and more relevant one than this about the club that one could report on if they did a little digging.

"Then dig it ...  "

LG
Legend
5.7K
·
23K
·
almost 17 years

Feverish wrote:

expecting a crowd of 30,000 tonight 

If only. That really would be an awesome day.

WeeNix
440
·
800
·
almost 9 years

patrick478 wrote:

If you want a story - there's a much bigger and more relevant one than this about the club that one could report on if they did a little digging.

Ok is it a good or bad story for the club? 

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
over 12 years

Jaickin wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

If you want a story - there's a much bigger and more relevant one than this about the club that one could report on if they did a little digging.

Ok is it a good or bad story for the club? 

Nixie sex tape.

Good or bad probably depends on your point of view.

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up