Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
over 13 years

2ndBest wrote:

NZF in a really awkward situation here. Morally they need to vote for Ali.But just because Ali is running on a 'change' platform, there is no guarantee that will be the case.

OFC likely to get an easier WCQ path with Blatter in charge. The financial implications of that can not be understated. Voting for Ali would put us offside with many of OFC nations given the money poured into the region recently. Which can have other implications when the OFC exco vote on various issues. Without being on the OFC exco then NZ is in a pretty sharkty position if they piss off all other OFC nations.

That's a relatively short term position Dale. As hard as it might seem, the right play is the the long term game here. Blatter won't be there in a few years time and change will happen.

Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years

Like it did when Blatter took over from the massively corrupt Havelange?

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

If NZ votes SeppTIC, then based on what's happened this week, It may have a bearing on our own Sponsors here in NZ, they may pull out - what sponsor want's to be tainted with corruption. 

Adidas, Coke, Hyundai, Castrol, Budweiser, McDonalds, Sony, Visa, Johnson and Jonson et al

Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
over 13 years

Hard News wrote:

Like it did when Blatter took over from the massively corrupt Havelange?

USA Attorney General and FBI involvement makes it different this time.

Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years

That's an interesting point.  [/off topicish]

Those people were involved in the Wall Street collapse as well where no one was given more than a bad telling off and they have continued with whatever they wanted.

Those people are turning a blind eye to corrupt practives in supporting the TPPI and all over the US government.

Those people have ignored massive evidence against those indicted here for decades.

So why are they sticking an oar in here?  Oh because US corporates lost money when the US didn't pick up a World Cup.  They are once again supporting the US rich.

It doesn't make what they are doing wrong and good on them for it but it's amusing as hell to see people painting them as the incorruptible white knights.

WeeNix
170
·
510
·
almost 10 years

I was listening to Radio Sport - a caller phoned in and said that if it wasn't for Blatter, the pheonix would not be playing in an overseas competition - A League. If that is the truth then I might have to stick with the Devil and hope he gets re-elected. 

Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
over 13 years

Hard News wrote:

That's an interesting point.  [/off topicish]

Those people were involved in the Wall Street collapse as well where no one was given more than a bad telling off and they have continued with whatever they wanted.

Those people are turning a blind eye to corrupt practives in supporting the TPPI and all over the US government.

Those people have ignored massive evidence against those indicted here for decades.

So why are they sticking an oar in here?  Oh because US corporates lost money when the US didn't pick up a World Cup.  They are once again supporting the US rich.

It doesn't make what they are doing wrong and good on them for it but it's amusing as hell to see people painting them as the incorruptible white knights.

Loretta Lynch is no fly by night prosecutor

and remember it is the Swiss, not the Yanks, investigating Word cup bid process.

Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years

I was listening to Radio Sport - a caller phoned in and said that if it wasn't for Blatter, the pheonix would not be playing in an overseas competition - A League. If that is the truth then I might have to stick with the Devil and hope he gets re-elected.

That is a stretch, plus his departure wouldn't necessarily change the current status.

Starting XI
480
·
3.5K
·
almost 14 years

Global Game wrote:

and remember it is the Swiss, not the Yanks, investigating Word cup bid process.

Investigating it while seeing FIFA as the victim. 

Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years

Yes.  Two completely seperate investigations.  The US one is not investigating World Cup stuff, only corruption in American tournmaents which is why the arrests are all people from CONCACAF or CONMEBOL. 

The Swiss investigation is whether FIFA were ripped off by people around them on the voting rights, not investigating corrupt processes in FIFA.

Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
about 17 years

Sports columnist Mark Reason believes NZ officials should have had the moral fibre to stand up and be counted.

"You needed people in influence to stand up and say, 'we don't think this is good enough," he said

"Some people might call me an idealist but there are other ways of raising money and we shouldn't have to be part of a very corrupt organisation to fund ourselves. No-one had been prepared to go on the record to condemn Fifa. They had every opportunity to remove themselves because professional football is such a small part of New Zealand sport."

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/opinion/68938704/did-nz-football-fail-to-take-a-stand-against-fifa

WeeNix
170
·
510
·
almost 10 years

I was listening to Radio Sport - a caller phoned in and said that if it wasn't for Blatter, the pheonix would not be playing in an overseas competition - A League. If that is the truth then I might have to stick with the Devil and hope he gets re-elected. 

True Hard News  - naive on my part

Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
over 13 years
Life and death
2.4K
·
5.5K
·
about 17 years

I'm not certain what 'crimes' have been committed. Paying bribes - is there a victim here if the payers are doing so with full knowledge? Granted, in the US, they have all of these 'racketeering' laws as a result of a long history of Mafia corruption, but do other countries have the same? I'm not certain we do. Switzerland has a history of protecting dubious investment and banking and if I recall correctly [all-be-it a long time ago] don't they have a system that promotes this kind of behaviour. Maybe that was one of the consideration when choosing Switzerland as the home of FIFA.

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
almost 15 years

Oska wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

whatever wrote:

I see that the Aussies have announced that they will now voting against Blatter if an election for President proceeds. It is important for NZ to take a stand and now also vote against Blatter.

Even if you stretch your imagination and accept that Blatter has not been involved with corruption, he has been negligent as this has occurred under his watch. I trust that NZ as a country which does not accept corruption will vote against this man.

I fear that if a vote proceeds there will be many who are looking to cover their backsides so they will side with Blatter.

That line is key. If you go so far to believe he is not involved, he is either negligent in letting it happen under his watch or he is asleep at the wheel. I think he is too cunning to be asleep at the wheel and to let it happen and do nothing is even more unbelievable. He is donkey deep in this...

 With due respect to your usually well informative posts, you say this like its a revelation.

Imitation is the biggest form of flattery.
Marquee
4.4K
·
6.8K
·
over 13 years

Global Game wrote:

Hard News wrote:

Like it did when Blatter took over from the massively corrupt Havelange?

USA Attorney General and FBI involvement makes it different this time.

I agree with this comment.  Previously everybody played along because nobody pointed out the emperor was naked. Blatter is a very talented politician (better than Berlusconi and their like) who knowd the dirt on everybody around him. Everybody was on the take (at certain level of access to the inner circle) therefore everybody played along. Blatter simply knew when to distance himself, when to put up a smoke curtain, and when to offer inducements which will appear above board. Who got caught? Small minnows, or those challenging Blatter for supremacy, like Bin Hamman.

Marquee
4.4K
·
6.8K
·
over 13 years

Mainland FC wrote:

Global Game wrote:

Hard News wrote:

Like it did when Blatter took over from the massively corrupt Havelange?

USA Attorney General and FBI involvement makes it different this time.

I agree with this comment.  Previously everybody played along because nobody pointed out aloud that the emperor was naked. Blatter is a very talented politician (better than Berlusconi and their like) who knows the dirt on everybody else around him. Everybody was on the take (at certain level of access to the inner circle) therefore everybody played along. Blatter simply knew when to distance himself, when to put up a smoke curtain, and when to offer inducements which will appear above board. Who got caught up in the anti-corruption campaign of Jerome Valcke in the past? Either small minnows, like the ex-OFC head, or those challenging Blatter for supremacy, like Bin Hamman.This time it is the top brass of CONCACAF that got tripped up by the US law and order, but it will be a long shot to see UEFA or AFC top brass taken to task.

Marquee
690
·
7.3K
·
almost 15 years

Global Game wrote:
Whilst Aussie vote against Blatter is honorable it won't be forgotten by fellow AFC bloc members that FFA stepped out of line, regardless of whether or not this is the beginning of the end for Blatter's FIFA.

I'd have thought the Asian countries would vote for the Jordanian prince for President, since Jordan are part of the AFC. 

Either way, NZ is in a tough position. Whatever they decide it will effect the under 20 tourney.

Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years
Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
over 13 years
Finally! NZF shows some balls. Hopefully we are one of at least 69 votes to force a 2nd round vote.
Marquee
210
·
7.6K
·
about 17 years
Starting XI
510
·
2.1K
·
almost 15 years

Feverish wrote:

Sports columnist Mark Reason believes NZ officials should have had the moral fibre to stand up and be counted.

"You needed people in influence to stand up and say, 'we don't think this is good enough," he said

"Some people might call me an idealist but there are other ways of raising money and we shouldn't have to be part of a very corrupt organisation to fund ourselves. No-one had been prepared to go on the record to condemn Fifa. They had every opportunity to remove themselves because professional football is such a small part of New Zealand sport."

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/opinion/68938704/did-nz-football-fail-to-take-a-stand-against-fifa

Who the fudge calls Mark Reason an idealist?!

Not the word that comes to mind.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
over 12 years

So, all the speeches and voting kickoff in a few hours then...

First Team Squad
1K
·
1.7K
·
over 15 years

In an ideal world, organisations like UEFA would have a much larger say in who makes the decisions over top of (typically corrupt nations in Africa and Asia. (Sorry those are terrible sweeping generalisations, but lets be honest?...). On top of this a few rules around presidency length are well overdue.

Hard News - I did not think the U.S. investigation was brought about by U.S. companies. I had read that the attorney general had previously worked towards nailing fifa but at the time she was more junior and didn't have the muscle. Now she obviously does.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
over 12 years

I reckon that there might be a last minute change of heart in some of the Blatter supporters, who knows what sort of rumours are flying around Zurich at the moment? I know on paper there's a lot of support for Sepp but if there's a sniff that Blatter is going down then I suspect that people might switch to Ali. 

UEFA's threatened boycott if Blatter wins might be a deciding factor - that'll cost a lot of people a lot of money, and if sponsors start to go too... it might be a situation where Blatter is given up to save the greater interests of everyone. Not for football, but for self-interest. Money talks, and although Blatter has got where he is by doling out money, who's to say that Ali wouldn't continue to dole out money for his long-term security in the post if he won. 

Ditching Blatter would mean that FIFA could probably change very little and continue to run as it has, but the public scrutiny would die down if Blatter was gone and the gravy train could continue pretty much uninterrupted. If Blatter stays, the whole house of cards could come crumbling down around him.

Of course, that's assuming Blatter doesn't have a stack of files on everyone to ensure he takes them down with him if he goes.... which he probably does.

Opinion Privileges revoked
4.6K
·
9.8K
·
over 14 years

Hard News wrote:

Genuflect! Show some respect! Down on one knee!

(PS Blatter is just like that cop at the end of Casablanca being SHOCKED to find gambling on the premises.)

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
over 12 years

20 Legend wrote:

In an ideal world, organisations like UEFA would have a much larger say in who makes the decisions over top of (typically corrupt nations in Africa and Asia. (Sorry those are terrible sweeping generalisations, but lets be honest?...). On top of this a few rules around presidency length are well overdue.

Hard News - I did not think the U.S. investigation was brought about by U.S. companies. I had read that the attorney general had previously worked towards nailing fifa but at the time she was more junior and didn't have the muscle. Now she obviously does.

I dunno about the first bit of that... I think there is a danger that a UEFA dominated FIFA would destroy the game outside of Europe. In principle, FIFA's commitment to redistributing money to the developing world and to ensuring that the international game stays relevant are worthy positions, it's just that they're tangled up in a web of corruption and bribes. The lack of transparency and accountability to football's biggest group of stakeholders (fans) is the core issue I think, not the nationality of the people making the decisions. 

And I get the thing that developing nations are more corrupt in general than first world ones, but I'd say it's only because it's easier for people there to get away with it. Blatter is Swiss, his right-hand man Jerome Valcke is French, and the charges that have led to this were brought about by an American (Chuck Blazer) who changed sides when his corruption got busted. Like I said, transparency and accountability are the keys to stopping this stuff.

First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years

I reckon that there might be a last minute change of heart in some of the Blatter supporters, who knows what sort of rumours are flying around Zurich at the moment? I know on paper there's a lot of support for Sepp but if there's a sniff that Blatter is going down then I suspect that people might switch to Ali. 

UEFA's threatened boycott if Blatter wins might be a deciding factor - that'll cost a lot of people a lot of money, and if sponsors start to go too... it might be a situation where Blatter is given up to save the greater interests of everyone. Not for football, but for self-interest. Money talks, and although Blatter has got where he is by doling out money, who's to say that Ali wouldn't continue to dole out money for his long-term security in the post if he won. 

Ditching Blatter would mean that FIFA could probably change very little and continue to run as it has, but the public scrutiny would die down if Blatter was gone and the gravy train could continue pretty much uninterrupted. If Blatter stays, the whole house of cards could come crumbling down around him.

Of course, that's assuming Blatter doesn't have a stack of files on everyone to ensure he takes them down with him if he goes.... which he probably does.

The problem is that if Blatter goes then a lot of other stuff could come out. I'm sure Blatter has the situation managed so that the other people at the top owe him. If Blatter goes then they all go down.

I'm pleased we will not be voting for Blatter but changing the vote now is hypocritical. We all knew Blatter was corrupt three weeks ago and we were still going to vote for him.

Opinion Privileges revoked
4.6K
·
9.8K
·
over 14 years

20 Legend wrote:

In an ideal world, organisations like UEFA would have a much larger say in who makes the decisions over top of (typically corrupt nations in Africa and Asia. (Sorry those are terrible sweeping generalisations, but lets be honest?...)

Yes. Let's be honest. Russia is a member of UEFA. And everyone knows how corrupt Italian football is.

Seriously: if you want to point fingers, point them at the tiny, poor countries who are more than happy to take bribes. And those seem to be mainly found in CONCACAF and - sadly - OFC.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
over 12 years

Ryan54 wrote:

I reckon that there might be a last minute change of heart in some of the Blatter supporters, who knows what sort of rumours are flying around Zurich at the moment? I know on paper there's a lot of support for Sepp but if there's a sniff that Blatter is going down then I suspect that people might switch to Ali. 

UEFA's threatened boycott if Blatter wins might be a deciding factor - that'll cost a lot of people a lot of money, and if sponsors start to go too... it might be a situation where Blatter is given up to save the greater interests of everyone. Not for football, but for self-interest. Money talks, and although Blatter has got where he is by doling out money, who's to say that Ali wouldn't continue to dole out money for his long-term security in the post if he won. 

Ditching Blatter would mean that FIFA could probably change very little and continue to run as it has, but the public scrutiny would die down if Blatter was gone and the gravy train could continue pretty much uninterrupted. If Blatter stays, the whole house of cards could come crumbling down around him.

Of course, that's assuming Blatter doesn't have a stack of files on everyone to ensure he takes them down with him if he goes.... which he probably does.

The problem is that if Blatter goes then a lot of other stuff could come out. I'm sure Blatter has the situation managed so that the other people at the top owe him. If Blatter goes then they all go down.

I'm pleased we will not be voting for Blatter but changing the vote now is hypocritical. We all knew Blatter was corrupt three weeks ago and we were still going to vote for him.

Yeah agreed, as I said at the end. 

And yup it's hypocritical but I'd rather that than sticking to our guns and continuing to support him.

Ultimately, if enough shark hits the fan that people involved get scared and change the way they run things then that's a good result, even if some of the scumbags stay. 

First Team Squad
1K
·
1.7K
·
over 15 years

20 Legend wrote:

In an ideal world, organisations like UEFA would have a much larger say in who makes the decisions over top of (typically corrupt nations in Africa and Asia. (Sorry those are terrible sweeping generalisations, but lets be honest?...). On top of this a few rules around presidency length are well overdue.

Hard News - I did not think the U.S. investigation was brought about by U.S. companies. I had read that the attorney general had previously worked towards nailing fifa but at the time she was more junior and didn't have the muscle. Now she obviously does.

I dunno about the first bit of that... I think there is a danger that a UEFA dominated FIFA would destroy the game outside of Europe. In principle, FIFA's commitment to redistributing money to the developing world and to ensuring that the international game stays relevant are worthy positions, it's just that they're tangled up in a web of corruption and bribes. The lack of transparency and accountability to football's biggest group of stakeholders (fans) is the core issue I think, not the nationality of the people making the decisions. 

And I get the thing that developing nations are more corrupt in general than first world ones, but I'd say it's only because it's easier for people there to get away with it. Blatter is Swiss, his right-hand man Jerome Valcke is French, and the charges that have led to this were brought about by an American (Chuck Blazer) who changed sides when his corruption got busted. Like I said, transparency and accountability are the keys to stopping this stuff.

Agree with everything you've said. Definitely need some accountability; back when Qatar won the world cup after failing to not come last in all of Fifa's 'world cup suitability tests' bar one the people making the decisions need to be challenged.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
over 12 years

Interesting article from 2013 about accountability and FIFA.

The review presented in this paper indicates that with only a few exceptions FIFA sits free from the formal mechanisms of accountability that are employed to hold international organizations to accountability to their own stated goals. Speaking in October 2012 of the FIFA reform effort that he has led, Mark Pieth offered a similar view, "Let’s admit that at this very point in time, self regulation is the only realistic option we have, in the case of FIFA certainly, and we also have to admit that it is a very difficult transition’’. The exceptions are FIFA’s formal accountability to Swiss law under its articles of incorporation and FIFA’s accountability to its sponsors, who benefit significantly from their relationship. However, to date neither the Swiss government nor FIFA sponsors have shown much ability or interest in shaping the governance of FIFA in a direction of reform. 

FIFA demonstrated time and again that it has essentially no hierarchical, supervisory, peer or public reputational accountability, and minimal fiscal accountability. This means that efforts to reform FIFA from within or as a consequence of pressure from governments, the public, the media or watchdog organizations are unlikely to result directly in any significant change. However, media attention in particular has the potential to keep FIFA reform on the public and political agenda and in the process confer some degree of perceived benefit to politicians who decide to take up FIFA reform as a cause. The revelation of new and titillating scandals would sustain such attention; in their absence, attention is likely to wane. If FIFA is to reform further in the aftermath of its two-year reform effort begun in 2011, then it appears likely that it will result from the exercise of legal accountability in an indirect manner. Because FIFA itself does not fall under the most relevant jurisdictions for the policing of corruption, such accountability would necessarily have to be applied indirectly by national or international (such as the European Union or European Council) governments, perhaps through oversight of FIFA or its member organizations or confederations.

Starting XI
1.4K
·
4.5K
·
over 16 years

Mark Aspden says on president vote: "We are voting on principle". How are they voting on the suspension of Israel then?

First Team Squad
1K
·
1.7K
·
over 15 years

Colvinator wrote:

Mark Aspden says on president vote: "We are voting on principle". How are they voting on the suspension of Israel then?

You probably don't go to many parties.
WeeNix
510
·
800
·
about 10 years
Watching TV3 News tonight and Blatter has himself one classy "Dolly Bird'. But will she stick around if he gets voted out?
WeeNix
280
·
630
·
over 16 years

I get the impression there is a lot more explosive stuff yet to come out about New Zealand's behind the scenes (till now) political manoeuvring in world football politics.

Get the popcorn ready. Might be fun over the next 48 hours to see what stuff the bigwigs in Oceania and Asia have to say about little old NZ.

Marquee
4.4K
·
6.8K
·
over 13 years

whatever wrote:
Watching TV3 News tonight and Blatter has himself one classy "Dolly Bird'. But will she stick around if he gets voted out?

Depends on her contract. There might be a severancy clause.

Marquee
1.2K
·
5.5K
·
over 13 years
For those inclined, between #CampbellLive, CRUvHUR and the cricket test, FIFA Congress is streaming live now. Link is on the FIFA website.
Surge
·
Can I have some lungs please miss
1.1K
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years

Get the popcorn ready. Might be fun over the next 48 hours to see what stuff the bigwigs in Oceania and Asia have to say about little old NZ.

Remembering these bigwigs hold the future of our club in their greasy, clammy, stinking hands.

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up