All Whites vs Solomon Islands | Fri 1 Sept | 7:30pm | QBE Stadium

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
almost 15 years

coochiee wrote:

I think when mentioning Tyler Boyd you need to channel a different type of movie "actress"

The 50 Shades of Gey actress?
Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
almost 15 years

Doloras wrote:

Given the dropping-like-flies of the senior players, perhaps Anfony's "blooding youth" policy might pay off after all.

... is Marco really injured or is it a CBF like (allegedly) Winston's?

Just wanna check this here. You are taking the piss right? You do realise he was stretchered off in the warm up?

I get conspiracy theorists but even this is absolutely stretching it by Ryan Nelsen to teach NZF a lesson about ditching Waitt for Ricki and the pay back is getting West Ham to have him go down 2 weeks before hand in the warm ups and stretchered off knowing that West Ham have 3 games away and wont win any (but its ok by West Ham) right as NZ are about to play Solomons for the right to represent OFC in the intercontinental play off - right?

Please tell me you were just having a laugh......

First Team Squad
280
·
1.6K
·
about 12 years

RR wrote:

Smeltz & Rojas out now. Brotherton in for Reid, Rufer in for Smeltz & Rojas not replaced

These aren't major losses in my opinion.

Rojas sometimes threatened in the confed cup, but didn't do it consistently.

Opinion Privileges revoked
4.7K
·
9.8K
·
over 14 years

Jeff Vader wrote:

coochiee wrote:

I think when mentioning Tyler Boyd you need to channel a different type of movie "actress"

The 50 Shades of Gey actress?

No, 50 Shades of Gay was a very different film

Marquee
2.7K
·
7.2K
·
about 17 years

Is there a Fever pub somewhere near the stadium? I am meant to catch up with a friend but looking at the Auckland transport website it's going to take a while to get there, so I'm thinking I might go straight to the stadium and hang out at the pub till kick off and he can meet me there...

Appiah without the pace
6.6K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

The Merchant Bar & Kitchen

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Is there a Fever pub somewhere near the stadium? I am meant to catch up with a friend but looking at the Auckland transport website it's going to take a while to get there, so I'm thinking I might go straight to the stadium and hang out at the pub till kick off and he can meet me there...

The bus from Britomart takes about 15-20 minutes, if you're staying in town it shouldn't really be a hassle.

Life and death
2.4K
·
5.5K
·
about 17 years

el grapadura wrote:

Is there a Fever pub somewhere near the stadium? I am meant to catch up with a friend but looking at the Auckland transport website it's going to take a while to get there, so I'm thinking I might go straight to the stadium and hang out at the pub till kick off and he can meet me there...

The bus from Britomart takes about 15-20 minutes, if you're staying in town it shouldn't really be a hassle.

No no, you are wrong. North Harbour Stadium is impossible to get to...... 
Moar stars
2.1K
·
4.7K
·
almost 12 years

How are people watching this without SKY/pub on Friday night? Sky UK aren't showing it I don't think. Out of luck.

Marquee
2.7K
·
7.2K
·
about 17 years

Looks like it's going to take 1.5hr which is ludicrous. I'm staying in Remuera but probably won't go there till after the game.  Will look into the quickest way to get tk Britomart then altgought their flyer costs $18 one way...a bit different from what we are used to here in the shire

Starting XI
2.1K
·
4.8K
·
almost 17 years

Balbi wrote:

Friday night, 7:35pm kickoff? Good luck getting most people south of the bridge to bother. Rush hour doesn't end until then.

5000 crowd I reckon.

Pure laziness then.  

I had no major issues leaving work at Auckland Int. and driving to Browns Bay at 5pm.  Always home by 7 at the very latest.  Also half of Auckland will be on the piss given its a Friday so less people driving at rush hour.

Marquee
620
·
6.3K
·
almost 17 years

a quick look gives some indication..disclaimer..didn't try time and day and there is some walking or maybe taxi at end.!

http://www.aucklandstadiums.co.nz/sites/Venues/journey-planner

Marquee
4K
·
5.5K
·
almost 12 years

Any indication of crowd numbers?

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

Doloras wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

coochiee wrote:

I think when mentioning Tyler Boyd you need to channel a different type of movie "actress"

The 50 Shades of Gey actress?

No, 50 Shades of Gay was a very different film

Freudian slip.

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.2K
·
over 9 years

Jerzy Merino wrote:

Doloras wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

coochiee wrote:

I think when mentioning Tyler Boyd you need to channel a different type of movie "actress"

The 50 Shades of Gey actress?

No, 50 Shades of Gay was a very different film

Freudian slip.

Doesn't he play for the Solomons?

RR
·
Bossi Insider
9.8K
·
34K
·
almost 16 years
Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years
First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.2K
·
over 9 years

Hudson's current bugbear/excuse is clearly 'fitness'. Allows him to bin anyone off.

RR
·
Bossi Insider
9.8K
·
34K
·
almost 16 years

Given the Roar's efforts so far this pre-season, it is really not that far out there to believe that his fitness program hasn't been up to standard

Phoenix Academy
240
·
360
·
over 10 years

There's a responsibility on the players to be in shape, but the used car salesman stated in March that "we're looking at ways to do everything possible" to get the players fit. So he waits until 3 days before the biggest game of the year to discover that a player isn't fit? As per usual with Anfony a whole lot of hot air and nothing actually achieved

Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years

I am surprised that an injured Dura who hasn't played a minute of pre-season (and you have to assume has not been training if he can't play) is somehow fitter than an 18 year-old who started for an A-League side within the last fortnight.

So what is the actual squad now?

Marquee
2.7K
·
7.2K
·
about 17 years

RR wrote:

Given the Roar's efforts so far this pre-season, it is really not that far out there to believe that his fitness program hasn't been up to standard

I think I have been very fair to AH until now and have kept my criticism to a minimum.

I am not sure what he will achieve by dismissing Ingham - a player he personally flew out to Australia to convince him to join his squad not so long ago - other than souring yet another personal relationship.

Is this an effort to send a message to the rest of the squad that everyone in the NT fold should keep themselves in peak condition all year long just in case they get picked?

Let's not forget that the A-League season isn't exactly around the corner - so what was he expecting?

I must say I am puzzled. If he isn't fit either don't call him up and don't play him. With the amount of injuries we've had this time around we can hardly afford to lose any more players so close to the game!

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.2K
·
over 9 years

*looks into crystal ball*

"well what can I do with injuries and a lot of the squad not fit, we're down to the bare bones. It's not like fitness wasn't on my list of things to solve early on in the year and I could organise and check on these things, I'm only the head coach of an international football team - it's amazing we managed to get a draw at all"

Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years

Is this an effort to send a message to the rest of the squad that everyone in the NT fold should keep themselves in peak condition all year long just in case they get picked?

Remembering he's already chucked Tuiloma for not being fit.

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Is this an effort to send a message to the rest of the squad that everyone in the NT fold should keep themselves in peak condition all year long just in case they get picked?

Let's not forget that the A-League season isn't exactly around the corner - so what was he expecting?

I must say I am puzzled. If he isn't fit either don't call him up and don't play him. With the amount of injuries we've had this time around we can hardly afford to lose any more players so close to the game!

This is preparation work for abrogating any personal responsibility if things go wrong over the next few days.

Phoenix Academy
240
·
360
·
over 10 years

It's ok guys. Chris Wood is tall and he's now a star of the EPL so we'll just hoof everything somewhere near him and he'll score 5 goals. Easy innit guvnor? 

Appiah without the pace
6.6K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Physical load are heavily monitored and controlled by clubs, so this could well be a reflection on the Roar rather than Dane himself. 

Starting XI
2.6K
·
2.4K
·
over 8 years

This simply isn't good enough from 3 players regarded as the future of the AWs. Hopefully this makes them realise Hudson is serious and they get their A into G.

Disregarding what Hudson coulda/shoulda/woulda done in the past, this is 100% the right move and good on him. There shouldn't be any excuses on Inghams part.

tradition and history
1.5K
·
9.9K
·
almost 17 years

Nelfoos wrote:

This simply isn't good enough from 3 players regarded as the future of the AWs. Hopefully this makes them realise Hudson is serious and they get their A into G.

Disregarding what Hudson coulda/shoulda/woulda done in the past, this is 100% the right move and good on him. There shouldn't be any excuses on Inghams part.

Especially at his age.

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Nelfoos wrote:

This simply isn't good enough from 3 players regarded as the future of the AWs. Hopefully this makes them realise Hudson is serious and they get their A into G.

Disregarding what Hudson coulda/shoulda/woulda done in the past, this is 100% the right move and good on him. There shouldn't be any excuses on Inghams part.

The only thing Hudson is serious about is protecting his own reputation. Even if it means throwing young players under the bus.

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.6K
·
over 14 years

Nelfoos wrote:

This simply isn't good enough from 3 players regarded as the future of the AWs. Hopefully this makes them realise Hudson is serious and they get their A into G.

Disregarding what Hudson coulda/shoulda/woulda done in the past, this is 100% the right move and good on him. There shouldn't be any excuses on Inghams part.

Agreed. Any player that is a professional and/or in the frame for the national team should be expected to be in the right physical condition for international windows, regardless of where their club pre-season is at. It's not that hard to see the club looking back at the less than great results against island nations recently, and identifying fitness/conditioning as a major factor.

Phoenix Academy
3
·
190
·
almost 17 years

I think this will be the team selected by Anferneeeeee

                                     Marinovic

                       Boxall        Dura       Smith

Colvey/Roux                                              Wynne/Doyle 

                                  Musa/Rufer

                         Thomas        McGlinchey

                             Barbarouses Wood

3-5-2

but for those that cant be fooled by Anferneeeeee

5-3-2

No excuses whatsoever if its not at laest a 3 goal winning margin

                            

                                    

Starting XI
2.6K
·
2.4K
·
over 8 years

el grapadura wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

This simply isn't good enough from 3 players regarded as the future of the AWs. Hopefully this makes them realise Hudson is serious and they get their A into G.

Disregarding what Hudson coulda/shoulda/woulda done in the past, this is 100% the right move and good on him. There shouldn't be any excuses on Inghams part.

The only thing Hudson is serious about is protecting his own reputation. Even if it means throwing young players under the bus.

That's a far, far more cynical view than I would be willing to take. 

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Nelfoos wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

This simply isn't good enough from 3 players regarded as the future of the AWs. Hopefully this makes them realise Hudson is serious and they get their A into G.

Disregarding what Hudson coulda/shoulda/woulda done in the past, this is 100% the right move and good on him. There shouldn't be any excuses on Inghams part.

The only thing Hudson is serious about is protecting his own reputation. Even if it means throwing young players under the bus.

That's a far, far more cynical view than I would be willing to take. 

I wish it was cynical.

Starting XI
2.6K
·
2.4K
·
over 8 years

el grapadura wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

This simply isn't good enough from 3 players regarded as the future of the AWs. Hopefully this makes them realise Hudson is serious and they get their A into G.

Disregarding what Hudson coulda/shoulda/woulda done in the past, this is 100% the right move and good on him. There shouldn't be any excuses on Inghams part.

The only thing Hudson is serious about is protecting his own reputation. Even if it means throwing young players under the bus.

That's a far, far more cynical view than I would be willing to take. 

I wish it was cynical.

You're right. Absurd is closer.

I can't see any of the players standing for Hudson chucking a kid to protect his own reputation.

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.6K
·
over 14 years

el grapadura wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

This simply isn't good enough from 3 players regarded as the future of the AWs. Hopefully this makes them realise Hudson is serious and they get their A into G.

Disregarding what Hudson coulda/shoulda/woulda done in the past, this is 100% the right move and good on him. There shouldn't be any excuses on Inghams part.

The only thing Hudson is serious about is protecting his own reputation. Even if it means throwing young players under the bus.

The kid is a professional and international footballer regardless of his age. If NZ is serious about competing at an international level, the management should take fitness and conditioning levels seriously. Plus you have no idea how the player was dealt with personally within the camp before being sent back to the Roar.

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Yugoboss wrote:

I think this will be the team selected by Anferneeeeee

                                     Marinovic

                       Boxall        Dura       Smith

Colvey/Roux                                              Wynne/Doyle 

                                  Musa/Rufer

                         Thomas        McGlinchey

                             Barbarouses Wood

3-5-2

but for those that cant be fooled by Anferneeeeee

5-3-2

No excuses whatsoever if its not at laest a 3 goal winning margin

                            

                                    

Smith won't be there. And Dura's been injured. Does that mean he's match fit? Hmmmm.

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

djtim3000 wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

This simply isn't good enough from 3 players regarded as the future of the AWs. Hopefully this makes them realise Hudson is serious and they get their A into G.

Disregarding what Hudson coulda/shoulda/woulda done in the past, this is 100% the right move and good on him. There shouldn't be any excuses on Inghams part.

The only thing Hudson is serious about is protecting his own reputation. Even if it means throwing young players under the bus.

The kid is a professional and international footballer regardless of his age. If NZ is serious about competing at an international level, the management should take fitness and conditioning levels seriously. Plus you have no idea how the player was dealt with personally within the camp before being sent back to the Roar.

Two things: if he is unfit, that should have been known to Hudson well before, not three days before the game. If he knew Tuiloma and Lewis were unfit, why didn't he know Ingham was unfit?

Secondly, this is the fourth time he's publically made this point in less than 12 months. Why is that? Are players not listening to him? Are his expectations unrealistic? Or is he laying a platform to explain away poor results when he tries to get his next gig?

and 1 other
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Nelfoos wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

This simply isn't good enough from 3 players regarded as the future of the AWs. Hopefully this makes them realise Hudson is serious and they get their A into G.

Disregarding what Hudson coulda/shoulda/woulda done in the past, this is 100% the right move and good on him. There shouldn't be any excuses on Inghams part.

The only thing Hudson is serious about is protecting his own reputation. Even if it means throwing young players under the bus.

That's a far, far more cynical view than I would be willing to take. 

I wish it was cynical.

You're right. Absurd is closer.

I can't see any of the players standing for Hudson chucking a kid to protect his own reputation.

I admire your youthful enthusiasm.

Starting XI
2.6K
·
2.4K
·
over 8 years

el grapadura wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

This simply isn't good enough from 3 players regarded as the future of the AWs. Hopefully this makes them realise Hudson is serious and they get their A into G.

Disregarding what Hudson coulda/shoulda/woulda done in the past, this is 100% the right move and good on him. There shouldn't be any excuses on Inghams part.

The only thing Hudson is serious about is protecting his own reputation. Even if it means throwing young players under the bus.

That's a far, far more cynical view than I would be willing to take. 

I wish it was cynical.

You're right. Absurd is closer.

I can't see any of the players standing for Hudson chucking a kid to protect his own reputation.

I admire your youthful enthusiasm.

I wish I could say the same for your conspiracy theories

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up

You need to be logged in to do that!