First Team Squad
1K
·
1.4K
·
about 10 years

We need to hit a crowd figure of 10k soon. Just to prove to those pricks we can do it.

An accurate representation of me right now -

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
over 12 years

But Wellington Phoenix's future is now in serious doubt, with the real possibility it is about to lose its licence when it comes up for renewal next year.

Chief Executive David Gallop admitted the topic came up in the board meeting that decided the current expansion plans but Nikou said it would be disrespectful to go into more detail.

But letting Phoenix's licence go unrenewed opens the door for Canberra to pick up Phoenix's spot the following season to join at the same time as South-West Sydney to make the A-League a 12 team competition.

"Phoenix are part of the A-League and they know what they have to do to be in the A-League," warned Nikou.

Starting XI
490
·
2.1K
·
over 14 years

And then it becomes a 13 team competition the next year anyway, so byes would be back? Something doesn't quite add up.

Marquee
4.3K
·
6.7K
·
over 13 years

Blew.2 wrote:

But Wellington Phoenix's future is now in serious doubt, with the real possibility it is about to lose its licence when it comes up for renewal next year.

Chief Executive David Gallop admitted the topic came up in the board meeting that decided the current expansion plans but Nikou said it would be disrespectful to go into more detail.

But letting Phoenix's licence go unrenewed opens the door for Canberra to pick up Phoenix's spot the following season to join at the same time as South-West Sydney to make the A-League a 12 team competition.

"Phoenix are part of the A-League and they know what they have to do to be in the A-League," warned Nikou.

.... and FFA also have that sign on their boardroom wall:

Appiah without the pace
6.5K
·
19K
·
over 16 years

Not exactly sure why those comments change anything for us. They are just stating the current facts. At the moment out licence is with the FFA. At some point it's likely it won't be.

"I would add to that, there is a lot of complexity into the negotiation around what a new operating model in the A-League will look like. "There is no doubt that one of the factors, perhaps not the biggest factor, but one of the factors will be how that places Wellington in the future of the competition."

Although perhaps FFA will have visions of them retaining (some?) goverance of the league. 

valeo
·
Legend
4.6K
·
18K
·
about 17 years

I read comments from one of the chairs of the Canberra bid - said to "read in between the lines" "what was said by the FFA was very deliberate" etc. and seems very confident they will have an A-League team shortly. (wish I could find it - was on twitter)

This plus Nikou's comments about how they discussed the Nix but "now wasn't an appropriate time" points towards Canberra replacing us when our license expires next season. Can anything save us? Fudge knows. They wouldn't be bothering to make these plans if they thought they would have no power soon.

Sigh, I am so sick of this bullshark. It seems like every time we start to feel positively about the team, this happens.

Appiah without the pace
6.5K
·
19K
·
over 16 years

Does canberra even have a money behind it?
Just seems like it's easy click bait over there to have an article when the FFA can't provide any guarentees.

Phoenix Academy
56
·
230
·
over 9 years

Nix being a success this season and next on field will give them headaches giving our license to some starterpack kit group

valeo
·
Legend
4.6K
·
18K
·
about 17 years

2ndBest wrote:

Does canberra even have a money behind it?
Just seems like it's easy click bait over there to have an article when the FFA can't provide any guarentees.

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/canberra-a-lea...

Yes. 

Starting XI
490
·
2.1K
·
over 14 years

Indo wonder if it is a hedge, if nix perform, then they jump to 14 teams, if they don't perform, then keep at 13 through license transfer...

valeo
·
Legend
4.6K
·
18K
·
about 17 years

zonknz wrote:

Indo wonder if it is a hedge, if nix perform, then they jump to 14 teams, if they don't perform, then keep at 13 through license transfer...

I think it's a 'the metrics have been a smokescreen all along and it wouldn't matter if you were getting 20k crowds, we just want you gone' kinda deal

Marquee
7.1K
·
9.3K
·
over 13 years

Doesn't matter what the FFA think or want.

Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
about 17 years

valeo wrote:

zonknz wrote:

Indo wonder if it is a hedge, if nix perform, then they jump to 14 teams, if they don't perform, then keep at 13 through license transfer...

I think it's a 'the metrics have been a smokescreen all along and it wouldn't matter if you were getting 20k crowds, we just want you gone' kinda deal

The nix getting 20k is not even in the realms of fantasy

Marquee
4.3K
·
6.7K
·
over 13 years

Feverish wrote:

valeo wrote:

zonknz wrote:

Indo wonder if it is a hedge, if nix perform, then they jump to 14 teams, if they don't perform, then keep at 13 through license transfer...

I think it's a 'the metrics have been a smokescreen all along and it wouldn't matter if you were getting 20k crowds, we just want you gone' kinda deal

The nix getting 20k is not even in the realms of fantasy

"We want 10k!"

Surge
·
Can I have some lungs please miss
1.1K
·
7.5K
·
over 16 years

Ryan wrote:

Doesn't matter what the FFA think or want.

Until such time as we have a contract with another entity running the league, it kinda does.
Opinion Privileges revoked
4.6K
·
9.8K
·
over 14 years

We know we can't meet Gallop's metrics.

If the new A-League after March is still run by Gallop's rules, we're doomed, no hope.

If the FFA are excluded after March, there is hope.

Everything depends on March. So why worry about anything anyone says now?

First Team Squad
320
·
1.4K
·
over 16 years

Doloras wrote:

We know we can't meet Gallop's metrics.

If the new A-League after March is still run by Gallop's rules, we're doomed, no hope.

If the FFA are excluded after March, there is hope.

Everything depends on March. So why worry about anything anyone says now?

Would still like to hear something from Rob confirming that he remains optimistic about our long term future, and that we'll have one without Gallops rules. 

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
over 12 years

scribbler wrote:

Doloras wrote:

We know we can't meet Gallop's metrics.

If the new A-League after March is still run by Gallop's rules, we're doomed, no hope.

If the FFA are excluded after March, there is hope.

Everything depends on March. So why worry about anything anyone says now?

Would still like to hear something from Rob confirming that he remains optimistic about our long term future, and that we'll have one without Gallops rules. 

Don’t expect anything till the NLWG reports back - N remember the AL clubs have not vote on the recommendations IIRCC 
Opinion Privileges revoked
4.6K
·
9.8K
·
over 14 years

One interpretation of recent media coverage: we know that certain Aussie journos act as mouthpieces for the FFA. Could it be that the point of "we might kick Nix out to give Canberra a spot" is precisely to win Canberra over to a NixOut position?

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
over 12 years

Doloras wrote:

One interpretation of recent media coverage: we know that certain Aussie journos act as mouthpieces for the FFA. Could it be that the point of "we might kick Nix out to give Canberra a spot" is precisely to win Canberra over to a NixOut position?

  MEDIA - WE NEED WELLINGTON 

MEDIA - WE DON'T MENTION WELLINGTON

Trialist
40
·
42
·
over 13 years

that’s just weird

Starting XI
4K
·
3.6K
·
about 10 years

valeo wrote:

Sigh, I am so sick of this bullshark. It seems like every time we start to feel positively about the team, this happens.

So bloody much this.  When things get good, this shark resurfaces so us fans don't feel too optimistic.  Can't help with crowds either.

If we get into the finals, get a home one, and sell the stadium out, that's our best chance for good crowds next year.  God I hope we exist in a few years.  I've spent too much time and money to be in those crowds for it to be for naught in a few years.

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
over 12 years

What if the FFA kicked us out and then the A League became independent? Could we live up to our name and get brought back in? I would like to think that it wouldn't be too difficult if the A League clubs wanted us back

Marquee
4.3K
·
6.7K
·
over 13 years

What if the FFA kicked us out and then the A League became independent? Could we live up to our name and get brought back in? I would like to think that it wouldn't be too difficult if the A League clubs wanted us back

They might want us back but the club as we know it might not survive in the meantime. I would much prefer the independent A-League to take over while we are still in the comp, with a decent team and a decent coach.

Legend
8.3K
·
15K
·
over 16 years

independent league must happen asap, I assume this is set for March 19? Once the the clubs can have full say in who plays in the league then we'll be safe - assuming the cronies in the FFA dont manage to sneak into the new independant a-league structure somehow.

Marquee
4.3K
·
6.7K
·
over 13 years

theprof wrote:

independent league must happen asap, I assume this is set for March 19? Once the the clubs can have full say in who plays in the league then we'll be safe - assuming the cronies in the FFA dont manage to sneak into the new independant a-league structure somehow.

I think this is what's driving the FFA agenda to seize the control of "expansion", they are trying to have their say what team gets in or gets out before the clubs do.

Starting XI
550
·
2.4K
·
over 14 years

What if the FFA kicked us out and then the A League became independent? Could we live up to our name and get brought back in? I would like to think that it wouldn't be too difficult if the A League clubs wanted us back

And pay another licence fee of about $15m, then negotiate the SKY TV deal again and after that prob end up in the 2nd Division.

Independent A-League is our only hope of staying anywhere. 

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
over 12 years

My impression - #APFCA gave away the vote on Independent A-league to the Federations of OZ to get rid of the dictatorship. (SLowyFFA)

So Nix future lies with the Australian Federations.  #Lotto odds are our future!

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
over 12 years

A simple example as to why we will never meet the metrixs.

Football Insider Forum.

Opinion Privileges revoked
4.6K
·
9.8K
·
over 14 years

Wales and England are different countries which are part of the same state - like Catalonia and the Basque country are part of Spain (for now).
On the other hand, Korea and Ireland are both single countries divided into two states...

Opinion Privileges revoked
4.6K
·
9.8K
·
over 14 years

Blew.2 wrote:

So Nix future lies with the Australian Federations.  #Lotto odds are our future!

Uh-oh. Then FFA dangling the carrot of "Nix out, Canberra in" might be very cunning, to get the ACT vote...

First Team Squad
1K
·
1.4K
·
about 10 years

Not sure what the right thread for this is, but Gallop is holding a press conference in about half an hour, apparently! #GallopOut hopefully ?

Starting XI
950
·
2.3K
·
almost 12 years

Not sure what the right thread for this is, but Gallop is holding a press conference in about half an hour, apparently! #GallopOut hopefully ?

Surely more likely to be about the Matildas debacle? Nix unlikely to be top of Gallop's radar right now I'd have thought. 

Chant Savant
2.5K
·
12K
·
almost 17 years

Doloras wrote:

Wales and England are different countries which are part of the same state - like Catalonia and the Basque country are part of Spain (for now).
On the other hand, Korea and Ireland are both single countries divided into two states...

North Island and South Island?

One in a million
4.1K
·
9.5K
·
about 17 years

I have been one person divided into two states for the last two Nix games: the states of despair and euphoria.

Trialist
70
·
120
·
over 6 years

Maybe a bit of a left-field suggestion - if the league does go independent and our future is secured, why not float the idea of selling a fraction of the club ownership to the public, the fans. Sell say 20% through one of those NZ crowd funding websites - enough for fans to feel closer to the club, while still not affecting the decision making, which can be left to the majority owners so they still feel comfortable being able to run the club. How cool would it be to say you own a share or two in a professional football club! Would encourage greater participation and alignment with the club. Just like for example, if you are a shareholder in Air NZ, you would be more likely to try and fly with Air NZ rather than jetstar (along with a couple obvious reasons!). 

Plus, having fans as shareholders, would encourage said shareholders to convince more friends and family to come along as they would have a bit of skin in the game.

First Team Squad
3.4K
·
1.4K
·
over 6 years

Whyme14 wrote:

Maybe a bit of a left-field suggestion - if the league does go independent and our future is secured, why not float the idea of selling a fraction of the club ownership to the public, the fans. Sell say 20% through one of those NZ crowd funding websites - enough for fans to feel closer to the club, while still not affecting the decision making, which can be left to the majority owners so they still feel comfortable being able to run the club. How cool would it be to say you own a share or two in a professional football club! Would encourage greater participation and alignment with the club. Just like for example, if you are a shareholder in Air NZ, you would be more likely to try and fly with Air NZ rather than jetstar (along with a couple obvious reasons!). 

Plus, having fans as shareholders, would encourage said shareholders to convince more friends and family to come along as they would have a bit of skin in the game.

Pretty sure this is how they do it with a lot of German clubs, it sounds like a great idea to me.

WeeNix
340
·
550
·
over 11 years

On another note, One of the owners (believe it was Henry Tait) put a cheeky 1000 dollar bar tab on at the pre match bar in Melbourne. I know its not the first time hes done this but gee whiz its fantastic to have owners who really care about the fans' experience. 

Theyve copped alot of flack re decisions to move games out of Wellington but need to appreciate that we have some of the best owners in the league. Very happy they own the nix.

and 7 others
Legend
11K
·
22K
·
almost 9 years

Free booze. A seducer since the beginning of time!

valeo
·
Legend
4.6K
·
18K
·
about 17 years

Whyme14 wrote:

Maybe a bit of a left-field suggestion - if the league does go independent and our future is secured, why not float the idea of selling a fraction of the club ownership to the public, the fans. Sell say 20% through one of those NZ crowd funding websites - enough for fans to feel closer to the club, while still not affecting the decision making, which can be left to the majority owners so they still feel comfortable being able to run the club. How cool would it be to say you own a share or two in a professional football club! Would encourage greater participation and alignment with the club. Just like for example, if you are a shareholder in Air NZ, you would be more likely to try and fly with Air NZ rather than jetstar (along with a couple obvious reasons!). 

Plus, having fans as shareholders, would encourage said shareholders to convince more friends and family to come along as they would have a bit of skin in the game.

Might need more fans first..

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up