Starting XI
2.4K
·
3.1K
·
over 11 years

Sanday wrote:

This Italy Sweden game could top Germany Poland on the boring stakes.

I need to remove a tree stump..... 

Germany v Poland was miles better. Sweden to slow and Italy does not want to play.

Groundskeeper Willie
700
·
7.5K
·
about 16 years
Extremely lucky to keep my multi alive with both Italy and the Czechs scoring late. Just need a draw between Iceland and Hungary now
Marquee
300
·
5K
·
about 17 years

The Irish seem to be having fun.

Go home to your sexy wives.

WeeNix
34
·
610
·
over 14 years

The Irish have the best fans !! 

Starting XI
930
·
2.3K
·
almost 12 years
Iceland: the NZ 2010 of Euro 2016
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

austin10 wrote:

What a bunch of dumb arses some of those Croatian supporters are!!!!  There side has played really well, leading 2-1 and only a few minutes to play and they fans start throwing flares onto the field...probably about 8 or 9. The games stops while the officials clear them up and then a explosive cracker gets thrown at an official. Ref calls everyone to the side line. Croation players run to quiet the fans down.

Game restart after a 8 min break. You can see the Croatian players are rattled. Long ball into the Croation box, hits defenders hand, penalty and it finishes 2-2. What a heartbreaker for the Croatian team. They played really well and scored two great goals. THe shot stats were something like 17 to 2 to Croatia

There will be more about this.UEFA will come down hard on Croatia. They will definetly get fined and they could lose points. Sometimes you wonder about the mentality of some football fans. 

This has nothing to do with stupidity, it was part of a plan to get the side kicked out of the tournament. It seems the full plan for that game didn't come to fruition by the sounds of it - could have been lot worse. There's also rumours that something is being planned for the Spain game.

The punishment will be a tricky one for UEFA - it will definitely involve a hefty fine, and if the organiser insists, no more Croatian fans being allowed inside stadiums (but UEFA may be reluctant to go there). Loss of points and being kicked out (at this stage at least) unlikely to be options.

The Czechs should be counting their lucky stars they're still in this tournament because of this.

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Sanday wrote:

Former Croatia manager Slaven Bilic on ITV: "It is very sad that we have to talk about this. We have an issue. It started six, seven, eight years ago. There are many fans who are against the Croatian FA and we are paying fines all the time. We have played games behind closed doors. It is unbelievable what those fans are doing.

"There is a riot between themselves. You can see the majority of the fans telling them not to do it. But some of them are on a mission. It is probably not the last time they will do it.

"They think the Croatian FA rarely plays in Split, they think it's all about Zagreb. It is a clash between the north and the south."

If correct that is a shame.

That's just scratching the surface. The organised fan groups have effectively been at war with HNS (Croatian Football Federation) for the past 4-5 years.

Starting XI
2.2K
·
4.3K
·
over 11 years

Gutted for Iceland but how brilliant were Ronaldo's misses? Couldn't have happened to a nicer player.

Marquee
4.2K
·
6.7K
·
over 13 years

Quite a few groups will be going "down to the wire" with the second qualifier from the group only identified after the final round.

And Iceland is still with a chance!  If they advance from the group that would be an amazing achievement for a country with a population of not quite half a million and not many all-year-round grassy paddocks.

Their (relative) success spurns me on to suggest that Christchurch teams should send a joint team to the next Oceania Nations Cup. Same population, same difficulty with facilities.... we'd probably beat the AWs in the final.

Marquee
4.2K
·
6.7K
·
over 13 years

Does anyone remember from what day (from what game) will Prime TV do the FTA broadcasts of the Euro 2016, as per SKY TV early announcements?

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Good win for Albania this morning, they've given themselves a chance. One thing I couldn't understand though - they get a corner on about 94.50 gone in the game (there was 5 minutes of added time), and instead of getting the ball in and trying to get another goal to improve their chances, they just play it short, and the ref blows for full time. Seemed quite strange to me.

Jaume
·
WeeNix
300
·
970
·
almost 8 years

el grapadura wrote:

Good win for Albania this morning, they've given themselves a chance. One thing I couldn't understand though - they get a corner on about 94.50 gone in the game (there was 5 minutes of added time), and instead of getting the ball in and trying to get another goal to improve their chances, they just play it short, and the ref blows for full time. Seemed quite strange to me.

As opposed to the All Whites not using an indirect free kick inside the box and instead sending it to the left where they proceeded to protect the ball despite it being one of the best chances of the game vs New Caledonia in the semi-final? Sharkty nations play negative football, nothing new there.
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

I'm not disagreeing with you, and you're probably right in that that kind of mentality almost instinctively took over. It was just really weird - they literally had nothing to lose (if the ball had been cleared out/Romania gained possession, that would have been full time), but could have potentially put themselves in a better position.

Marquee
1.3K
·
5.3K
·
over 16 years

el grapadura wrote:

I'm not disagreeing with you, and you're probably right in that that kind of mentality almost instinctively took over. It was just really weird - they literally had nothing to lose (if the ball had been cleared out/Romania gained possession, that would have been full time), but could have potentially put themselves in a better position.

Probably not 100% sure how much time the ref will allow and it only takes a very short time to go from defending a corner to scoring at the other end, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

Marquee
380
·
9.6K
·
about 17 years

Interesting Reddit thread on the Croatian issue:

an_explanation_to_rsoccer_about_why_did_croatian

(From Arseblog)

WeeNix
34
·
610
·
over 14 years

Wales on fire...have other goal scorers apart from Bale...

Marquee
300
·
5K
·
about 17 years

The Welsh Xavi running the show.A standing "O".

Russia are a rabble.

WeeNix
34
·
610
·
over 14 years

Eng are dross..0-0 wins me $ 15

Wales 3 - Russia 0 

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

el grapadura wrote:

austin10 wrote:

What a bunch of dumb arses some of those Croatian supporters are!!!!  There side has played really well, leading 2-1 and only a few minutes to play and they fans start throwing flares onto the field...probably about 8 or 9. The games stops while the officials clear them up and then a explosive cracker gets thrown at an official. Ref calls everyone to the side line. Croation players run to quiet the fans down.

Game restart after a 8 min break. You can see the Croatian players are rattled. Long ball into the Croation box, hits defenders hand, penalty and it finishes 2-2. What a heartbreaker for the Croatian team. They played really well and scored two great goals. THe shot stats were something like 17 to 2 to Croatia

There will be more about this.UEFA will come down hard on Croatia. They will definetly get fined and they could lose points. Sometimes you wonder about the mentality of some football fans. 

This has nothing to do with stupidity, it was part of a plan to get the side kicked out of the tournament. It seems the full plan for that game didn't come to fruition by the sounds of it - could have been lot worse. There's also rumours that something is being planned for the Spain game.

The punishment will be a tricky one for UEFA - it will definitely involve a hefty fine, and if the organiser insists, no more Croatian fans being allowed inside stadiums (but UEFA may be reluctant to go there). Loss of points and being kicked out (at this stage at least) unlikely to be options.

The Czechs should be counting their lucky stars they're still in this tournament because of this.

In the end a pretty straightforward punishment - 100k Euro, and a ban on selling tickets to 'hooligans'.

Rumours of more incidents being planned for tomorrow's game, hard to know how realistic though. You'd imagine that the French police and organisers will pick up their game significantly too.

Appiah without the pace
6.5K
·
19K
·
over 16 years

Italy, France and England all on the same side of the draw. Germany should probably join them.

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

2ndBest wrote:

Italy, France and England all on the same side of the draw. Germany should probably join them.

Yep, was just looking at that. If Germany beat Northern Ireland (and you'd think they will) they'll be on that side of the draw too - and if Spain don't win group D (by losing to us tomorrow :-)), they'll be on that side of the draw. If they win the group, they have a pretty straightforward run to the final.

Marquee
4.2K
·
6.7K
·
over 13 years

Germany seem to be the team to beat in their half of the draw unless they trip up over Italy, that is.

The other side looks Spain's to take. That would an amazing final to watch.

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Mainland FC wrote:

Germany seem to be the team to beat in their half of the draw unless they trip up over Italy, that is.

Over France?

Starting XI
2.2K
·
4.3K
·
over 11 years

We blew a pretty nice looking run to the semi final by not holding on against Russia who have been the only rival to Sweden for worst team in the tournament. Probably lose to Portugal on penalties once again in the next round.

tradition and history
1.5K
·
9.9K
·
almost 17 years

ajc28 wrote:

We blew a pretty nice looking run to the semi final by not holding on against Russia who have been the only rival to Sweden for worst team in the tournament. Probably lose to Portugal on penalties once again in the next round.

That is what happens when you make so many changes.

Marquee
4.2K
·
6.7K
·
over 13 years

Leggy wrote:

ajc28 wrote:

We blew a pretty nice looking run to the semi final by not holding on against Russia who have been the only rival to Sweden for worst team in the tournament. Probably lose to Portugal on penalties once again in the next round.

That is what happens when you make so many changes.

not on penalties they wouldn't

Marquee
4.2K
·
6.7K
·
over 13 years

el grapadura wrote:

Mainland FC wrote:

Germany seem to be the team to beat in their half of the draw unless they trip up over Italy, that is.

Over France?

I think they have wood over France this time around. 

France plays "straight" in this tournament and they tend to crack under pressure (except in WC 2008) while Italy is as usual unpredictable.

Phoenix Academy
43
·
500
·
almost 12 years

Leggy wrote:

[/quote]

That is what happens when you make so many changes.

Nothing to do with the changes. 

England have scored three goals, lovely approach play especially wide but very poor on the final ball, corners have been pants. Flatter to deceive, par for the course!!!

..

Starting XI
2.2K
·
4.3K
·
over 11 years

The team Hodgson put out this morning actually looks our best lineup. It's not like we were dire and lucky to escape with a draw. We had 29 shots and just lacked a finish, but still the keeper made 2 or 3 great saves and we had another cleared off the line. One of those days it just didn't go in. Liverpool fans probably going mental over why Skrtl never plays that well for them. He always seemed to be in the right place to make a block. Failing to hold on against Russia has cost us.

Apparently we have only had more shots than that twice in major tournament games and both times were in 1966.

Phoenix Academy
120
·
250
·
almost 12 years

Leggy wrote:

ajc28 wrote:

We blew a pretty nice looking run to the semi final by not holding on against Russia who have been the only rival to Sweden for worst team in the tournament. Probably lose to Portugal on penalties once again in the next round.

That is what happens when you make so many changes.

I find it inconceivable that upon entering a tournament a manager doesn't know his strongest team( by team I mean say, 9 out of the 11,with perhaps 2 positions up for grabs). Hodgson tinkered endlessly in the friendlies, as a result never playing a settled team until the first game of the tournament. Ridiculous! He still seems undecided on who are the best forwards/midfielders for England: One of Sir Alf Ramsey's great strengths was he created a TEAM, with club-like interplay: Uncle Roy seems to be the complete opposite, thinking individual quality will pull them through...IT WON'T.

Also the folly of taking one (out of form) winger in the shape of Sterling, is a serious mistake; today's game was crying out for a genuine wide man to get behind a packed defence. There are no other wing options in the squad...Townsend, a better player for country than club, should have been included.

Starting XI
2.2K
·
4.3K
·
over 11 years

Bit difficult to compare with Alf Ramsey's era because they didn't have substitutions in those days so you couldn't leave anything on the bench to try and change the game later. Ramsey also changed his formation and tactics after the first game (notably dropping a winger and then doing without wingers), and Geoff Hurst wasn't in the team until the quarter final either.

WeeNix
34
·
610
·
over 14 years

C' mon GAWA ...

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Mainland FC wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Mainland FC wrote:

Germany seem to be the team to beat in their half of the draw unless they trip up over Italy, that is.

Over France?

I think they have wood over France this time around. 

France plays "straight" in this tournament and they tend to crack under pressure (except in WC 2008) while Italy is as usual unpredictable.

Germany look a bit toothless to me - I think the lack of an actual forward is hurting them, they've really not looked very threatening going forward so far.

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years

el grapadura wrote:

Mainland FC wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Mainland FC wrote:

Germany seem to be the team to beat in their half of the draw unless they trip up over Italy, that is.

Over France?

I think they have wood over France this time around. 

France plays "straight" in this tournament and they tend to crack under pressure (except in WC 2008) while Italy is as usual unpredictable.

Germany look a bit toothless to me - I think the lack of an actual forward is hurting them, they've really not looked very threatening going forward so far.

Klose is not an easy man to replace
Starting XI
930
·
2.3K
·
almost 12 years
Literally every team has looked a bit toothless at some point during the first two games, I haven't seen any team completely dominate. What side of the draw are Belgium on? They looked sharp against Ireland imo.
Phoenix Academy
120
·
250
·
almost 12 years

ajc28 wrote:

Bit difficult to compare with Alf Ramsey's era because they didn't have substitutions in those days so you couldn't leave anything on the bench to try and change the game later. Ramsey also changed his formation and tactics after the first game (notably dropping a winger and then doing without wingers), and Geoff Hurst wasn't in the team until the quarter final either.

Subs came into international football in 1968, well before Ramsey finished up as England manager, and in that '66 tournament he barely changed the lineup: tried to play a winger, without success, and replaced an injured Greaves with Hurst.That's it. My general point still holds: he didn't chop and change willy nilly like Hodgson does.The hardest part of International football is creating a team out of players you use/have access to, so fleetingly.Therefore, it's imperative to make minimal changes and develop teamwork. Roy makes countless substitutions/new lineups in games, but to what effect? It frequently seems like change for change sake:Instead of making a couple of changes and retaining "the spine" of the team, he makes upwards of 6+ changes, shoehorns people into the team, frequently not in their best position, and alters the formation. No wonder England's play frequently looks disjointed, in competitive and friendly fixtures...

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Fitzy wrote:
Literally every team has looked a bit toothless at some point during the first two games, I haven't seen any team completely dominate.

What side of the draw are Belgium on? They looked sharp against Ireland imo.

E2 puts them on the good side of the draw (though they could be facing the prospect of playing Portugal in the Round of 16 if Portugal wins group F). If they slip up and end up being one of the best third placed teams, they could end up on either side of the draw (but either playing France, or probably Spain unless the latter lose to my lot tomorrow).

Starting XI
2.4K
·
3.1K
·
over 11 years

sthn.jeff wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Mainland FC wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Mainland FC wrote:

Germany seem to be the team to beat in their half of the draw unless they trip up over Italy, that is.

Over France?

I think they have wood over France this time around. 

France plays "straight" in this tournament and they tend to crack under pressure (except in WC 2008) while Italy is as usual unpredictable.

Germany look a bit toothless to me - I think the lack of an actual forward is hurting them, they've really not looked very threatening going forward so far.

Klose is not an easy man to replace

Gomez is their Klose style of play replacement. They won't play high balls into the box strategy for the North Ireland game, according to Loew, because that is their defending strong point. 

Loew agrees with the lack of chances in the games so far. He is pretty relaxed and said it not a general problem and players are good enough and he trust eg. Mueller and Goetze to show more, everyone has to be faster around the box.

For me the most interesting part of the interview was (also in context with Hudson interviews), that he got in depth, without being asked, about the lack of players who can beat a defender in one on one situation to create space. They know the issue and already implementing training in ALL U age groups to fix that in the future. Loew said the focus in the past was the fast passing game and they are good in that but they lack those kind of players who willing to go one on one.

Marquee
2.1K
·
6.4K
·
over 14 years
Ray Hicks wrote:
ajc28 wrote:

Bit difficult to compare with Alf Ramsey's era because they didn't have substitutions in those days so you couldn't leave anything on the bench to try and change the game later. Ramsey also changed his formation and tactics after the first game (notably dropping a winger and then doing without wingers), and Geoff Hurst wasn't in the team until the quarter final either.

Subs came into international football in 1968, well before Ramsey finished up as England manager, and in that '66 tournament he barely changed the lineup: tried to play a winger, without success, and replaced an injured Greaves with Hurst.That's it. My general point still holds: he didn't chop and change willy nilly like Hodgson does.The hardest part of International football is creating a team out of players you use/have access to, so fleetingly.Therefore, it's imperative to make minimal changes and develop teamwork. Roy makes countless substitutions/new lineups in games, but to what effect? It frequently seems like change for change sake:Instead of making a couple of changes and retaining "the spine" of the team, he makes upwards of 6+ changes, shoehorns people into the team, frequently not in their best position, and alters the formation. No wonder England's play frequently looks disjointed, in competitive and friendly fixtures...

That Was one thing our dear Ricki managed to do well. Getting best players on the park for extended periods
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

number8 wrote:

sthn.jeff wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Mainland FC wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Mainland FC wrote:

Germany seem to be the team to beat in their half of the draw unless they trip up over Italy, that is.

Over France?

I think they have wood over France this time around. 

France plays "straight" in this tournament and they tend to crack under pressure (except in WC 2008) while Italy is as usual unpredictable.

Germany look a bit toothless to me - I think the lack of an actual forward is hurting them, they've really not looked very threatening going forward so far.

Klose is not an easy man to replace

Gomez is their Klose style of play replacement. They won't play high balls into the box strategy for the North Ireland game, according to Loew, because that is their defending strong point. 

Loew agrees with the lack of chances in the games so far. He is pretty relaxed and said it not a general problem and players are good enough and he trust eg. Mueller and Goetze to show more, everyone has to be faster around the box.

For me the most interesting part of the interview was (also in context with Hudson interviews), that he got in depth, without being asked, about the lack of players who can beat a defender in one on one situation to create space. They know the issue and already implementing training in ALL U age groups to fix that in the future. Loew said the focus in the past was the fast passing game and they are good in that but they lack those kind of players who willing to go one on one.

Yep, Gomez is the obvious Klose replacement on paper, but is a bit more agricultural and technically deficient, so not quite the same fit with their team. Yet not having an option there means that finding pockets of open space in the attacking third has been lot more difficult for Muller and Goetze, especially against more defensive minded teams. The struggle up front isn't new for Germany at these Euros - they weren't super proficient in the qualifying either (which the goalless losses to Poland and Ireland clearly demonstrate). 

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up