tradition and history
1.5K
·
9.9K
·
almost 17 years
el grapadura wrote:
Leggy wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
Leggy wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
I'm sorry, I don't understand. Are you saying that Australia was very good in 2006?


I said pretty good not very good, and they were.
Got through to the next round and were unlucky to lose on a dubious pen. to Italy.


They got very lucky against Japan, put in their place by Brazil, and had a see-saw battle and a draw against a fairly average Croatian team to get to the second round. Won 1 game out of 4 in the entire tournament, thanks to late, late goals against Japan. That's not pretty good - that's OK, but nothing more.


A bit better than the AW's


Obviously, but that hardly makes them 'pretty good' in international football.


If they are ranked in the top 20 they must be pretty good , as there are many teams ranked lower.
What do think is pretty good?
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
FIFA ranking is meaningless. There's at least 10 teams ranked below Australia that could absolutely rape them.

Just like there's teams in front of them that Oz could beat quite comfortably.

Like I said, they are an OK side, but nothing more than that. el grapadura2010-04-03 10:17:05
tradition and history
1.5K
·
9.9K
·
almost 17 years
el grapadura wrote:
FIFA ranking is meaningless. There's at least 10 teams ranked below Australia that could absolutely rape them.

Just like there's teams in front of them that Oz could beat quite comfortably.

Like I said, they are an OK side, but nothing more than that.


I agree, but the same could be said for the teams 20 to 30 behind the AW"s
Starting XI
2
·
2.3K
·
over 14 years
I think come World Cup time,we'll see there are atleast three teams ranked higher than the All Whites that they could "absolutely rape"!
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
Leggy wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
FIFA ranking is meaningless. There's at least 10 teams ranked below Australia that could absolutely rape them.

Just like there's teams in front of them that Oz could beat quite comfortably.

Like I said, they are an OK side, but nothing more than that.


I agree, but the same could be said for the teams 20 to 30 behind the AW"s


No argument from me there.
Trialist
0
·
23
·
over 15 years
el grapadura wrote:
FIFA ranking is meaningless.


Michael Glading seems to disagree with you.

NZF chief executive Glading told Sunday News his exact expectation for the national team is "the tough but achievable challenge" of a top 30 Fifa ranking by 2020, and has personally researched and drafted a plan to make it happen.

Source: Stuff.co.nz.
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
Edgar wrote:

el grapadura wrote:
FIFA ranking is meaningless.
Michael Glading seems to disagree with you.NZF chief executive Glading told Sunday News his exact expectation for
the national team is "the tough but achievable challenge" of a top 30
Fifa ranking by 2020, and has personally researched and drafted a plan
to make it happen.
Source: Stuff.co.nz.


Yeah, well, it's Glading.
a.k.a AJ13
520
·
1.5K
·
over 14 years
People say rankings dont mean anything... but we all know they do. f**k being ranked 79 for the next 10 years, its going to do nothing for the game. It'l be used as an excuse to not fund the AWs, and excuse for other teams to not want to play us, an excuse for the nation to not care about football.
Starting XI
2
·
3.1K
·
about 17 years
We are now ranked 78th! Meanwhile of our WC opponents, Slovaka drop 5 to 38, Paraguary drop 7 to 33 and Italy remain 5th. Also, North Korea (grouped with Brazil, Portugal and Ivory Coast and who the TAB give a better chance of winning the tournament than us) slip further to 106th. South Africa also down to 90th, so we are comfortably only 3rd lowest ranked at WC! And Australia slips to 20th.
Starting XI
120
·
4.1K
·
almost 17 years
Nelsen in his book picks North Korea to get out of the group
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
Starting XI
120
·
4.1K
·
almost 17 years
Mmm that was about my thought. Im thinking it may have been a misprint, from reading the thing doesn't seem like it was proofread or edited that well
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
Reckon a quick job to cash in on the World Cup?
Starting XI
120
·
4.1K
·
almost 17 years
Absolutely, but good on him. Will be a cool book for 12 year olds not so much for others.
First Team Squad
5
·
1.3K
·
about 17 years
bopman wrote:
Absolutely, but good on him. Will be a cool book for 12 year olds not so much for others.


sounds about right for my reading age....sweet
Starting XI
70
·
3.2K
·
almost 17 years
Sorry if this is covered elsewhere but this sh*t is seriously going to affect our Fifa ranking.

What is the highest NZ has ever been btw?

At this rate they'll start seeding us in Pot A for the WC draw in 2014- or maybe i 've been on the pot too much

But seriously, i imagine there'll be new ranking after the WC, and we'll be moving
Opinion Privileges revoked
4.6K
·
9.8K
·
over 14 years
Salmon07 wrote:

What is the highest NZ has ever been btw?


47.
Starting XI
440
·
3.4K
·
almost 15 years
http://www.yellowfever.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=12270

was this thread, may need to be renamed. Actually were 2 others I think. Would be cool to keep all updates in one place to track the history.

Mods?

Starting XI
70
·
3.2K
·
almost 17 years
oOh, bagsmine to stay open-Purty Please!
Starting XI
480
·
4.1K
·
over 14 years
another question, usually do rankings at end of month
will they do 1 end of month or wait till after world cup?
a.k.a AJ13
520
·
1.5K
·
over 14 years
detoxin wrote:
another question, usually do rankings at end of month
will they do 1 end of month or wait till after world cup?


Rankings last updated 26 May 2010, next release 14 Jul 2010.

Starting XI
480
·
4.1K
·
over 14 years
thanks, just noticed it said on fifa website,.... thanks for that tho lol
Starting XI
24
·
3K
·
about 17 years
Could be interesting how high we climb.
In the last five games we have got the following pionts
Australia 0
Serbia 555
Slovenia 0
Slovakia 664
Italy 780
Thats an average of 400 pts (which is also our current ranking pionts)
 
A win/draw with Paraguay should get NZ up inside the top 50.
Trialist
0
·
90
·
almost 16 years
Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
You get no points for losing games...
Starting XI
24
·
3K
·
about 17 years
Rainman wrote:
Friendlies don't count?
 
Friendlies certianly do count. You get nil points for losing a game.
Starting XI
2
·
2.3K
·
over 14 years
You should get points just for being close. Just because.
Legend
2.3K
·
17K
·
about 17 years
WeeNix
17
·
870
·
about 17 years
nightz wrote:
Could be interesting how high we climb.
In the last five games we have got the following pionts
Australia 0
Serbia 555
Slovenia 0
Slovakia 664
Italy 780
Thats an average of 400 pts (which is also our current ranking pionts)
 
A win/draw with Paraguay should get NZ up inside the top 50.


To move into the top 50 we would have to increase our points by about 200 from 410 to 610.
So given your calculations above and this morning's result, how does this relate to our total points.
Should also be considered that top 50 teams within striking distance of NZ who appeared in the 2006 WC and not 2010 will lose the big points gained there. Poland, Equador and Sweden
Points are calculated on games played over the last 4 years. (Next update 14th July)
Starting XI
24
·
3K
·
about 17 years
Thats another 676 points this morning which gives us an average of 445 pts since the last rankings.
Uiron, you are correct about pts calculated over the last 4 yrs. The weighting is 100% 50% 30% 20%.  Any movement up the rankings is helped by teams above you dropping pts. In the 2 months after the 2006 world cup most the teams ranked 50 to 100 dropped a large amount of points. If that happens again it will help our rise.
Trialist
0
·
23
·
over 15 years
Trialist
0
·
56
·
over 16 years
The website that regularly calculates FIFA world rankings is showing our ranking as 55th after the Paraguay game. LInk below. That is close to our best ever - 47th in 2002.

http://www.football-rankings.info/
Marquee
460
·
6.9K
·
about 17 years
Tegal
·
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
A win wouldve sent us soaring id imagine.
Starting XI
440
·
3.4K
·
almost 15 years
Thread going here

http://www.yellowfever.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=12270&PN=4

Trialist
0
·
23
·
over 15 years
New Zealand will be the best climbers in the next release of FIFA ranking.

FIFA Ranking: July 2010 preview (VI).
Appiah without the pace
6.5K
·
19K
·
over 16 years
Legend
2.3K
·
17K
·
about 17 years
First Team Squad
9
·
1.6K
·
about 17 years
I am hoping that others drop points faster than we do in the coming months, I mean they have more points to drop than we earned four years ago....

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up